Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30814547›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Object-based attention in complex, naturalistic auditory streams.

Giorgio Marinato, Daniel Baldauf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Does Amplitude Compression Help or Hinder Attentional Neural Speech Tracking?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Attention-Driven Modulation of Auditory Cortex Activity during Selective Listening in a Multispeaker Setting.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cat-astrophic effects of sudden interruptions on spatial auditory attention.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Decoding Object-Based Auditory Attention from Source-Reconstructed MEG Alpha Oscillations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giorgio MarinatoCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Trento, Italy. giorgio.marinato@unitn.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8856-5003
Daniel BaldaufCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Trento, Italy. daniel.baldauf@unitn.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vision, objects have been described as the 'units' on which non-spatial attention operates in many natural settings. Here, we test the idea of object-based attention in the auditory domain within ecologically valid auditory scenes, composed of two spatially and temporally overlapping sound streams (speech signal vs. environmental soundscapes in Experiment 1 and two speech signals in Experiment 2). Top-down attention was directed to one or the other auditory stream by a non-spatial cue. To test for high-level, object-based attention effects we introduce an auditory repetition detection task in which participants have to detect brief repetitions of auditory objects, ruling out any possible confounds with spatial or feature-based attention. The participants' responses were significantly faster and more accurate in the valid cue condition compared to the invalid cue condition, indicating a robust cue-validity effect of high-level, object-based auditory attention.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleSpeech

Identifiers

PMID30814547
PMCPMC6393668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.