Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30814515›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2019

AKT-dependent and -independent pathways mediate PTEN deletion-induced CNS axon regeneration.

Haoliang Huang, Linqing Miao, Liu Yang, Feisi Liang, Qizhao Wang, Pei Zhuang, Yang Sun, Yang Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Longitudinal in vivo CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haoliang HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Linqing MiaoShriners Center for Neural Repair and Rehabilitation, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Liu YangShriners Center for Neural Repair and Rehabilitation, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Feisi LiangShriners Center for Neural Repair and Rehabilitation, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Qizhao WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Pei ZhuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Yang SunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Yang HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. huyang@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-1649
Stanford University · USTemple University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Elucidating Neuron-Intrinsic Molecular Mechanisms of Optic Nerve RegenerationR01EY024932 · NEI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Yang Hu · 2015 to 2026
$4.8M
Neuroprotection by Modulating ER Stress in GlaucomaR01EY023295 · NEI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI HU, YANG · 2013 to 2022
$3.8M
The role of primary cilia in glaucoma pathogenesisR01EY025295 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Yang Sun · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
Developing Novel Neuroprotective Strategies for EAE/Optic NeuritisR01EY028106 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HU, YANG · 2018 to 2021
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023295NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024932NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025295NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) acts as a brake for the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT-mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, the deletion of which promotes potent central nervous system (CNS) axon regeneration. Previously, we demonstrated that AKT activation is sufficient to promote CNS axon regeneration to a lesser extent than PTEN deletion. It is still questionable whether AKT is entirely responsible for the regenerative effect of PTEN deletion on CNS axons. Here, we show that blocking AKT or its downstream effectors, mTORC1 and GSK3β, significantly reduces PTEN deletion-induced mouse optic nerve regeneration, indicating the necessary role of AKT-dependent signaling. However, AKT is only marginally activated in PTEN-null mice due to mTORC1-mediated feedback inhibition. That combining PTEN deletion with AKT overexpression or GSK3β deletion achieves significantly more potent axonal regeneration suggests an AKT-independent pathway for axon regeneration. Elucidating the AKT-independent pathway is required to develop effective strategies for CNS axon regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous SystemFemaleMaleMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1MiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNerve RegenerationOptic NerveProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPTEN PhosphohydrolaseSignal TransductionMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPTEN PhosphohydrolasePten protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID30814515
PMCPMC6393504
OpenAlexW2916559769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.