Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30814114›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

GP retention in the UK: a worsening crisis. Findings from a cross-sectional survey.

Katherine Owen, Thomas Hopkins, Thomas Shortland, Jeremy Dale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
22.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Sustaining a career in general practice: a qualitative study of experienced GPs in South West England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. GP workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Review
  12. Counting general practitioners: a comparative repeat cross-sectional analysis of GPs in NHS general practice in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Retaining family physicians in comprehensive primary care: Scoping review.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  17. Devalued: the financial erosion of the GP role.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine OwenDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Thomas HopkinsDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Thomas ShortlandDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Jeremy DaleDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9256-3553
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate how recent national policy-led workforce interventions are affecting intentions to remain working as a general practitioner (GP).

designOnline questionnaire survey with qualitative and quantitative questions. SETTING AND

participantsAll GPs (1697) in Wessex region, an area in England for which previous GP career intention data from 2014 is available.

results929 (54.7%) participated. 59.4% reported that morale had reduced over the past two years, and 48.5% said they had brought forward their plans to leave general practice. Intention to leave/retire in the next 2 years increased from 13% in the 2014 survey to 18% in October/November 2017 (p=0.02), while intention to continue working for at least the next 5 years dropped from 63.9% to 48.5% (p<0.0001). Age, length of service and lower job satisfaction were associated with intention to leave. Work intensity and amount were the most common reasons given for intention to leave sooner than previously planned; 51.0% participants reported working more hours than 2 years previously, predominantly due to increased workload.GPs suggested increased funding, more GPs, better education of the public and expanding non-clinical and support staff as interventions to improve GP retention.National initiatives that aligned with these priorities, such as funding to expand practice nursing were viewed positively, but low numbers of GPs had seen evidence of their roll-out. Conversely, national initiatives that did not align, such as video consulting, were viewed negatively.

conclusionWhile recent initiatives may be having an impact on targeted areas, most GPs are experiencing little effect. This may be contributing to further lowering of morale and bringing forward intentions to leave. More urgent action appears to be needed to stem the growing workforce crisis.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPersonnel LoyaltyPersonnel SelectionCareer ChoiceCross-Sectional StudiesGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansJob SatisfactionState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomWorkforceWorkloadgeneral practiceretentionretirementworkforce

Identifiers

PMID30814114
PMCPMC6398901
OpenAlexW2917006929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.