Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30813985›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2019

Welfare and Scientific Considerations of Tattooing and Ear Tagging for Mouse Identification.

Johnny V Roughan, Tatum Sevenoaks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Tailtag: A multi-mouse tracking system to measure social dynamics in complex environments.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Acclimation and Blood Sampling: Effects on Stress Markers in C57Bl/6J Mice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. The 3Rs in Experimental Liver Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Grimace scale assessment duringFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Reliability of the Mouse Grimace Scale in C57BL/6JRj Mice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johnny V RoughanInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK. j.v.roughan@newcastle.ac.uk.
Tatum SevenoaksInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 087961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ear tagging is perceived as less painful or stressful than tattooing and therefore is generally considered less harmful or costly to welfare. However, ear tags are more difficult to read than tattoos and can fall out, and mice usually require restraint for the tag numbers to be read accurately. We assessed the welfare and scientific implications of tattooing by using a commercial device compared with restraint in a device versus ear tagging. Male and female BALB/c mice (

Indexed as

Animal WelfareTattooingAnimal Identification SystemsAnimalsFemaleHumansLaboratory Animal ScienceMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPain

Identifiers

PMID30813985
PMCPMC6433351
OpenAlexW2919712930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.