Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30813958›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Ultrasonic cartilage thickness measurement is accurate, reproducible, and reliable-validation study using contrast-enhanced micro-CT.

Simon Damian Steppacher, Markus Simon Hanke, Corinne Andrea Zurmühle, Pascal Cyrill Haefeli, Frank Michael Klenke, Moritz Tannast

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validation of ultrasonography for measurement of cartilage thickness in the equine carpus.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon Damian SteppacherDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland. simon.steppacher@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4907-8939
Markus Simon HankeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Corinne Andrea ZurmühleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Pascal Cyrill HaefeliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Frank Michael KlenkeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Moritz TannastDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CH

Funding

Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V. Project number: P186-A163-Siebenrock- EP2-step1-hüfte-op-II-66k-2008-10Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung Project number: PP00P3_144856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltrasonography is a fast and patient-friendly modality to assess cartilage thickness. However, inconsistent results regarding accuracy have been reported. Therefore, we asked what are (1) the accuracy, (2) reproducibility, and (3) reliability of ultrasonographic cartilage thickness measurement using contrast-enhanced micro-CT for validation?

methodsA series of 50 cartilage-bone plugs were harvested from fresh bovine and porcine joints. Ultrasonic cartilage thickness was determined using an A-mode, 20-MHz hand-held ultrasonic probe with native (1580 m/s) and adjusted speed of sound (1696 m/s). All measurements were performed by two observers at two different occasions. Angle of insonation was controlled by tilting the device and recording minimal thickness. Retrieval of exact location for measurement was facilitated by aligning the circular design of both cartilage-bone plug and ultrasonic device. There was no soft tissue interference between cartilage surface and ultrasonic probe. Ground truth measurement was performed using micro-CT with iodine contrast agent and a voxel size of 16 μm. The mean cartilage thickness was 1.383 ± 0.402 mm (range, 0.588-2.460 mm).

resultsMean accuracy was 0.074 ± 0.061 mm (0.002-0.256 mm) for native and 0.093 ± 0.098 mm (0.000-0.401 mm) for adjusted speed of sound. Bland-Altman analysis showed no systematic error. High correlation was found for native and adjusted speed of sound with contrast-enhanced micro-CT (both r = 0.973; p < 0.001). A perfect agreement for reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.992 and 0.994) and reliability (ICC 0.993, 95% confidence interval 0.990-0.995) was found.

conclusionsUltrasonic cartilage thickness measurement could be shown to be highly accurate, reliable, and reproducible. The A-mode ultrasonic cartilage thickness measurement is a fast and patient-friendly modality which can detect early joint degeneration and facilitate decision making in joint preserving surgery.

Indexed as

AnimalsCartilage, ArticularCattleReproducibility of ResultsSpecies SpecificitySwineUltrasonographyX-Ray MicrotomographyAccuracyCartilage thicknessMicro-CTUltrasonographyValidation

Identifiers

PMID30813958
PMCPMC6391750
OpenAlexW2925760805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.