Trial reportCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2019
CT-based peritumoral radiomics signatures to predict early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma after curative tumor resection or ablation.
Trial report in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
109 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in predicting recurrence after first-line treatment of liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Radiomics for preoperative prediction of early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review: radiomics for the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021Pooled it
- Prognostic role of artificial intelligence among patients with hepatocellular cancer: A systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- APASA: adaptive selection of informative peritumoral regions for improved automated cancer lesion analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Predictive imaging in abdominal oncology: current trends and future directions.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Regionally modulated radiomics analysis in PET/CT imaging: application to prognosis prediction of head and neck cancer.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional multimodal imaging for predicting early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma ablation based on CT radiomics and deep learning multimodal models.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of artificial intelligence models in radiology: a systemic scoping review of diagnostic and endovascular applications.CVIR endovascular · 2025Review
- Review
- MRI-based radiomics signatures for predicting the efficacy of targeted therapy with lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Liver Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Prognostic and predictive imaging markers of hepatocellular carcinoma: a pictorial essay.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Radiomics analysis based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for predicting early recurrence after hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Preliminary study on the ability ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Preoperative model for predicting early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients using radiomics and deep learning: A multicenter study.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Based Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Method to Predict the 90-Day Prognosis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.The neurologist · 2025Article
- Transparency and Representation in Clinical Research Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo construct a prediction model based on peritumoral radiomics signatures from CT images and investigate its efficiency in predicting early recurrence (ER) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn total, 156 patients with primary HCC were randomly divided into the training cohort (109 patients) and the validation cohort (47 patients). From the pretreatment CT images, we extracted 3-phase two-dimensional images from the largest cross-sectional area of the tumor. A region of interest (ROI) was manually delineated around the lesion for tumoral radiomics (T-RO) feature extraction, and another ROI was outlined with an additional 2 cm peritumoral area for peritumoral radiomics (PT-RO) feature extraction. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression model was applied for feature selection and model construction. The T-RO and PT-RO models were constructed. In the validation cohort, the prediction efficiencies of the two models and peritumoral enhancement (PT-E) were evaluated qualitatively by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves and decision curves and quantitatively by area under the curve (AUC), the category-free net reclassification index (cfNRI) and integrated discrimination improvement values (IDI).
resultsBy comparing AUC values, the prediction accuracy in the validation cohort was good for the PT-RO model (0.80 vs. 0.79, P = 0.47) but poor for the T-RO model (0.82 vs. 0.62, P < 0.01), which was significantly overfitted. In the validation cohort, the ROC curves, calibration curves and decision curves indicated that the PT-RO model had better calibration efficiency and provided greater clinical benefits. CfNRI indicated that the PT-RO model correctly reclassified 47% of ER patients and 32% of non-ER patients compared to the T-RO model (P < 0.01); additionally, the PT-RO model correctly reclassified 24% of ER patients and 41% of non-ER patients compared to PT-E (P = 0.02). IDI indicated that the PT-RO model could improve prediction accuracy by 0.22 (P < 0.01) compared to the T-RO model and by 0.20 (P = 0.01) compared to PT-E.
conclusionThe CT-based PT-RO model can effectively predict the ER of HCC and is more efficient than the T-RO model and the conventional imaging feature PT-E.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.