Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30813956›Full record

Trial reportCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2019

CT-based peritumoral radiomics signatures to predict early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma after curative tumor resection or ablation.

Quan-Yuan Shan, Hang-Tong Hu, Shi-Ting Feng, Zhen-Peng Peng, Shu-Ling Chen, Qian Zhou, Xin Li, Xiao-Yan Xie, Ming-de Lu, Wei Wang and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Preliminary study on the ability ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Quan-Yuan ShanDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0113-8020
Hang-Tong HuDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5361-233X
Shi-Ting FengDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zhen-Peng PengDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Shu-Ling ChenDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Qian ZhouClinical Trials Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xin LiGE Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Yan XieDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9761-9525
Ming-de LuDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9771-8144
Wei WangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China. wangw73@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-583X
Ming KuangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhong Shan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China. kuangm@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7397-5779

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of Chin 81701719National Natural Science Foundation of China 81701701Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2017A020215195Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2017A030313661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo construct a prediction model based on peritumoral radiomics signatures from CT images and investigate its efficiency in predicting early recurrence (ER) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 156 patients with primary HCC were randomly divided into the training cohort (109 patients) and the validation cohort (47 patients). From the pretreatment CT images, we extracted 3-phase two-dimensional images from the largest cross-sectional area of the tumor. A region of interest (ROI) was manually delineated around the lesion for tumoral radiomics (T-RO) feature extraction, and another ROI was outlined with an additional 2 cm peritumoral area for peritumoral radiomics (PT-RO) feature extraction. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression model was applied for feature selection and model construction. The T-RO and PT-RO models were constructed. In the validation cohort, the prediction efficiencies of the two models and peritumoral enhancement (PT-E) were evaluated qualitatively by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves and decision curves and quantitatively by area under the curve (AUC), the category-free net reclassification index (cfNRI) and integrated discrimination improvement values (IDI).

resultsBy comparing AUC values, the prediction accuracy in the validation cohort was good for the PT-RO model (0.80 vs. 0.79, P = 0.47) but poor for the T-RO model (0.82 vs. 0.62, P < 0.01), which was significantly overfitted. In the validation cohort, the ROC curves, calibration curves and decision curves indicated that the PT-RO model had better calibration efficiency and provided greater clinical benefits. CfNRI indicated that the PT-RO model correctly reclassified 47% of ER patients and 32% of non-ER patients compared to the T-RO model (P < 0.01); additionally, the PT-RO model correctly reclassified 24% of ER patients and 41% of non-ER patients compared to PT-E (P = 0.02). IDI indicated that the PT-RO model could improve prediction accuracy by 0.22 (P < 0.01) compared to the T-RO model and by 0.20 (P = 0.01) compared to PT-E.

conclusionThe CT-based PT-RO model can effectively predict the ER of HCC and is more efficient than the T-RO model and the conventional imaging feature PT-E.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesAdultAgedAnatomy, Cross-SectionalCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedHepatocellular carcinomaRadiomicsRecurrenceTomography

Identifiers

PMID30813956
PMCPMC6391838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.