ReviewBiomolecules2019
Extreme Fuzziness: Direct Interactions between Two IDPs.
Review in Biomolecules, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conformational modulation of intrinsically disordered transactivation domains for cancer therapy.PNAS nexus · 2025Review
- Isoform-specific C-terminal phosphorylation drives autoinhibition of Casein kinase 1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Isoform-specific C-terminal phosphorylation drives autoinhibition of Casein Kinase 1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Combined prediction and design reveals the target recognition mechanism of an intrinsically disordered protein interaction domain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Conformational changes in the negative arm of the circadian clock correlate with dynamic interactomes involved in post-transcriptional regulation.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Highly Charged Proteins and Their Repulsive Interactions Antagonize Biomolecular Condensation.JACS Au · 2023Article
- The importance of the compact disordered state in the fuzzy interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins.Chemical science · 2022Article
- Not Only Systemin: Prosystemin Harbors Other Active Regions Able to Protect Tomato Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Article
- FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices.eLife · 2021Review
- The diversity of molecular interactions involving intrinsically disordered proteins: A molecular modeling perspective.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- The Anti-Inflammatory Protein TNIP1 Is Intrinsically Disordered with Structural Flexibility Contributed by Its AHD1-UBAN Domain.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Insights from Poincaré, Waddington, and Lamarck.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Intrinsically Disordered Proteins in Chronic Diseases.Biomolecules · 2019Article
- Studies on Molecular Dynamics of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Their Fuzzy Complexes: A Mini-Review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein interactions involving intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) greatly extend the range of binding mechanisms available to proteins. In interactions employing coupled folding and binding, IDPs undergo disorder-to-order transitions to form a complex with a well-defined structure. In many other cases, IDPs retain structural plasticity in the final complexes, which have been defined as the fuzzy complexes. While a large number of fuzzy complexes have been characterized with variety of fuzzy patterns, many of the interactions are between an IDP and a structured protein. Thus, whether two IDPs can interact directly to form a fuzzy complex without disorder-to-order transition remains an open question. Recently, two studies of interactions between IDPs (4.1G-CTD/NuMA and H1/ProTα) have found a definite answer to this question. Detailed characterizations combined with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation demonstrate that direct interactions between these two pairs of IDPs do form fuzzy complexes while retaining the conformational dynamics of the isolated proteins, which we name as the extremely fuzzy complexes. Extreme fuzziness completes the full spectrum of protein-protein interaction modes, suggesting that a more generalized model beyond existing binding mechanisms is required. Previous models of protein interaction could be applicable to some aspects of the extremely fuzzy interactions, but in more general sense, the distinction between native and nonnative contacts, which was used to understand protein folding and binding, becomes obscure. Exploring the phenomenon of extreme fuzziness may shed new light on molecular recognition and drug design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.