Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30813585›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2019

Differentiation of Patients with Balance Insufficiency (Vestibular Hypofunction) versus Normal Subjects Using a Low-Cost Small Wireless Wearable Gait Sensor.

Tam Q Nguyen, Jonathan H Young, Amanda Rodriguez, Steven Zupancic, Donald Y C Lie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tam Q NguyenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA. tam.nguyen@ttuhsc.edu.
Jonathan H YoungSchool of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA. jonathan.h.young@ttuhsc.edu.
Amanda RodriguezDepartment of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA. amanda.rodriguez@unl.edu.
Steven ZupancicDepartment of Otolaryngology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA. steven.zupancic@ttuhsc.edu.
Donald Y C LieDepartment of Otolaryngology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA. donald.lie@ttu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1788-8910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balance disorders present a significant healthcare burden due to the potential for hospitalization or complications for the patient, especially among the elderly population when considering intangible losses such as quality of life, morbidities, and mortalities. This work is a continuation of our earlier works where we now examine feature extraction methodology on Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) tests and machine learning classifiers to differentiate patients with balance problems versus normal subjects on an expanded cohort of 60 patients. All data was obtained using our custom designed low-cost wireless gait analysis sensor (WGAS) containing a basic inertial measurement unit (IMU) worn by each subject during the DGI tests. The raw gait data is wirelessly transmitted from the WGAS for real-time gait data collection and analysis. Here we demonstrate predictive classifiers that achieve high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in distinguishing abnormal from normal gaits. These results show that gait data collected from our very low-cost wearable wireless gait sensor can effectively differentiate patients with balance disorders from normal subjects in real-time using various classifiers. Our ultimate goal is to be able to use a remote sensor such as the WGAS to accurately stratify an individual's risk for falls.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAccidental FallsAgedBiosensing TechniquesFemaleGaitHumansMachine LearningMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicPostural BalanceQuality of Lifedynamic gait index (DGI) testsfall preventionfall-risk predictionmachine learningwireless gait analysis sensor (WGAS)

Identifiers

PMID30813585
PMCPMC6468670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.