Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30813545›Full record

ReviewCells2019

Gynecological Cancers Translational, Research Implementation, and Harmonization: Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Consensus and Still Open Questions.

Marina Bagnoli, Ting Yan Shi, Charlie Gourley, Paul Speiser, Alexander Reuss, Hans W Nijman, Carien L Creutzberg, Suzy Scholl, Anastassia Negrouk, Mark F Brady and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Organoids of the female reproductive tract.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Marina BagnoliDepartment of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy. marina.bagnoli@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Ting Yan ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China. tyshi80@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5356-0365
Charlie GourleyUniversity of Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, MRC IGMM, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK. Charlie.Gourley@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2377-7221
Paul SpeiserDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital Vienna, 1090 Wien, Austria. pspeis54@gmail.com.
Alexander ReussCoordinating Center for Clinical Trials, at the Philipps-University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany. alexander.reuss@kks.uni-marburg.de.
Hans W NijmanDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. h.w.nijman@umcg.nl.
Carien L CreutzbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands. c.l.creutzberg@lumc.nl.
Suzy SchollDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France. suzy.scholl@curie.fr.
Anastassia NegroukEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium. anastassia.negrouk@eortc.org.
Mark F BradyDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA. brady@gogstats.org.
Kosei HasegawaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama 1397-1, Japan. koseih@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1903-7001
Katsutoshi OdaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan. katsutoshi-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-2468-9573
Iain A McNeishDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. i.mcneish@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9387-7586
Elise C KohnClinical Investigations Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. kohne@mail.nih.gov.
Amit M OzaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada. Amit.Oza@uhn.ca.
Helen MacKayDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto/Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada. helen.mackay@sunnybrook.ca.
David MillanDepartment of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TR, UK. david.millan59@btinternet.com.
Katherine BennettGynecologic Cancer InterGroup, Operations, Kingston, ON K7K-7A6, Canada. gcigopsasst@gmail.com.
Clare ScottWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. scottc@wehi.edu.au.
Delia MezzanzanicaDepartment of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy. delia.mezzanzanica@istitutotumori.mi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9664-6871

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15973Medical Research Council G0501974Medical Research Council G0601891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of personalized medicine, the introduction of translational studies in clinical trials has substantially increased their costs, but provides the possibility of improving the productivity of trials with a better selection of recruited patients. With the overall goal of creating a roadmap to improve translational design for future gynecological cancer trials and of defining translational goals, a main discussion was held during a brainstorming day of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Translational Research Committee and overall conclusions are here reported. A particular emphasis was dedicated to the new frontier of the immunoprofiling of gynecological cancers. The discussion pointed out that to maximize patients' benefit, translational studies should be integral to clinical trial design with standardization and optimization of procedures including a harmonization program of Standard Operating Procedures. Pathology-reviewed sample collection should be mandatory and ensured by dedicated funding. Biomarker validation and development should be made public and transparent to ensure rapid progresses with positive outcomes for patients. Guidelines/templates for patients' informed consent are needed. Importantly for the public, recognized goals are to increase the involvement of advocates and to improve the reporting of translational data in a forum accessible to patients.

Indexed as

ConsensusGenital Neoplasms, FemaleTranslational Research, BiomedicalBiomarkers, TumorClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkers definitiongynecological cancersprecision medicinesamples collectiontranslational studies design

Identifiers

PMID30813545
PMCPMC6468728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.