Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30813520›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Removal of Artifacts from EEG Signals: A Review.

Xiao Jiang, Gui-Bin Bian, Zean Tian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 193 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
44.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 786 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao JiangInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, China. jx19950427@163.com.
Gui-Bin BianInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, China. guibin.bian@ia.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4708-2245
Zean TianSchool of Big Data and Information Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China. tianzean@126.com.
Guizhou University · CNShandong Institute of Automation · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFB1302704National Natural Science Foundation of China U1713220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) plays an important role in identifying brain activity and behavior. However, the recorded electrical activity always be contaminated with artifacts and then affect the analysis of EEG signal. Hence, it is essential to develop methods to effectively detect and extract the clean EEG data during encephalogram recordings. Several methods have been proposed to remove artifacts, but the research on artifact removal continues to be an open problem. This paper tends to review the current artifact removal of various contaminations. We first discuss the characteristics of EEG data and the types of different artifacts. Then, a general overview of the state-of-the-art methods and their detail analysis are presented. Lastly, a comparative analysis is provided for choosing a suitable methods according to particular application.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsBrainElectroencephalographyHumansSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedartifact removal techniquesartifactselectroencephalogram

Identifiers

PMID30813520
PMCPMC6427454
OpenAlexW2915196348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.