ArticleMedicine2019
Protocol for the development and validation of a driving simulator for evaluating the influence of drugs on driving performance.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validity and reliability of a driving simulator for evaluating the influence of medicinal drugs on driving performance.Psychopharmacology · 2021Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough automobile driving is often necessary in daily life, most package inserts for psychotropic drugs in Japan prohibit patients from driving under the influence of medication. This may be partially because no system to evaluate the influence of drugs on driving performance has been established. Standardized evaluation methods have been established in the Netherlands and the United States, but these cannot be implemented in Japan because of differences in road situations, traffic laws, and ethnicities. Therefore, to establish a method to evaluate the influence of drugs on driving performance in Japan, we planned a validation study using alcohol and a driving simulator (DS) and set a clinically meaningful threshold involving the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), which is a criterion standard evaluation item.
methodsThis study was designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 4-way, fourth-order crossover trial (Williams design). Twenty-four healthy Japanese men aged 21 to 64 years will be recruited through advertisements. The participants will be required to drive daily for over 3 years and to carry the active-type aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) gene polymorphism (ALDH 2*1/*1). Participants will be randomly assigned to 4 groups based on blood alcohol concentration (BAC): 0% (placebo), 0.025%, 0.05%, and 0.09%. The amount of alcohol intake will be calculated based on Widmark formula using a beverage that is a mixture of 40% vodka and orange juice. After a practice period, each examination period will be set with 6-day intervals. The primary outcome is SDLP in a 60-minute road-tracking test using the DS. The secondary outcomes are other evaluation items in the DS tasks and DS sickness and sleepiness according to questionnaire responses. The estimated difference in SDLP between BAC levels of 0.05% and 0% will be calculated using a linear model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee at Hakata Clinic and the Nagoya University Medical School Hospital Bioethics Review Committee. The trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and international conferences.
trial registrationThis study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 03572985 on June 28, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.