SynthesisMedicine2019
Pretransplant C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global assessment of C-reactive protein and health-related outcomes: an umbrella review of evidence from observational studies and Mendelian randomization studies.European journal of epidemiology · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Pre-Transplant C-Reactive Protein ≥ 20 mg/L Predicts Infection-Related Mortality After Heart Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio (CAR) Predicts Early Posttransplant Complications and Survival in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of C-reactive protein/platelet ratio from diagnosis to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Ferritin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Not Only a Marker of Inflammation and Iron Overload, but Also a Regulator of Cellular Iron Metabolism, Signaling and Communication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pretransplant Systemic Lipidomic Profiles in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.Cancers · 2022Article
- Assessment of mechanisms of infectious pneumonia based on expression of fibrinogen, procalcitonin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein expression, T helper 17 cells, regulatory T cells interleukin-10, and interleukin-17.Translational pediatrics · 2022Article
- Review
- Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) and the Potential of Novel Biomarkers in Optimizing Management of Acute and Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD).Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous reports have explored the prognostic value of pretransplant serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT), but the results remain conflicting. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the prognostic value of pretransplant serum CRP in patients receiving ASCT.
methodsWe systematically searched eligible studies in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from 1999 to September 2018. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% CIs were used to synthetically assess the prognostic value of pre-ASCT CRP in terms of overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD).
resultsA total of 14 articles with 15 studies containing 3458 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that high pre-ASCT CRP level was significantly related to worse OS (HR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.34-1.98; P < .05), to an increased risk of NRM (HR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.62-2.62; P < .05), and aGVHD (HR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.07-1.71; P < .05). Additionally, sensitivity and subgroup analyses demonstrated that our pooled results were stable and reliable.
conclusionsHigh pre-ASCT serum CRP was significantly associated with worse OS, as well as higher risk of NRM and aGVHD. CRP may be a candidate factor of updating the existing risk scoring systems or establishing a novel risk scoring systems, which has the potential of guiding patient selection for ASCT and proceeding with risk-adapted therapeutic strategies. However, more high-quality clinical studies and basic research are required to further validate our findings in view of several limitations in our meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.