Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30813131›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2019

Pregnancy outcomes of elective induction in low-risk term pregnancies: A propensity-score analysis.

Eun Duc Na, Sung Woon Chang, Eun Hee Ahn, Sang Hee Jung, Young Ran Kim, Inkyung Jung, Hee Young Cho

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Oxytocin Administration in Low-Risk Women, a Retrospective Analysis of Birth and Neonatal Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eun Duc NaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam.
Sung Woon ChangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam.
Eun Hee AhnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam.
Sang Hee JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam.
Young Ran KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam.
Inkyung JungDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Young ChoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam.
CHA University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes in low-risk pregnant women whose labor was electively induced or expectantly managed at term.Healthy women with viable, vertex singleton pregnancies at 37 to 40 weeks of gestation were included. Women electively induced (n = 416) in each week (37-37, 38-38, 39-39, 40-40 weeks) were compared with pregnant women with spontaneous labor (n = 487). The primary outcome was mode of delivery. A propensity score (PS) was derived using logistic regression to model the probability of elective induction group as a function of potential confounders. Altogether, 284 women with elective induction were matched with 284 women who underwent expectant management to create a PS-matched population. All analysis was performed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). All P values reported of the significance level was set at <.05.There are no significant differences of delivery mode, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal complication between PS-matched groups. Incidence of antepartum complications showed higher in the elective induction group compared to the spontaneous labor group (P = .04). When comparing each gestational week, incidence of NICU admission at 38 weeks in the elective induction group [10/74 (13.5%)] was significantly higher than in and the spontaneous labor group [2/74 (2.7%)] (P = .04).Elective induction of labor at term is not associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery. However, overall incidence of NICU admission at 38 gestational weeks seems to be increased in elective induction.

Indexed as

Labor, InducedPregnancy OutcomeAdultCesarean SectionExtraction, ObstetricalFemaleGestational AgeHumansIntensive Care, NeonatalLabor OnsetPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30813131
PMCPMC6408014
OpenAlexW2918816147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.