Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30813113›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Protocol for a mixed-methods exploratory investigation of care following intensive care discharge: the REFLECT study.

Sarah Vollam, Owen Gustafson, Lisa Hinton, Lauren Morgan, Natalie Pattison, Hilary Thomas, J Duncan Young, Peter Watkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah VollamNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2835-6271
Owen GustafsonAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Lisa HintonNuffield Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-3151
Lauren MorganNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Natalie PattisonSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Hilary ThomasCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
J Duncan YoungNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter WatkinsonNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-3927

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0215-36149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA substantial number of patients discharged from intensive care units (ICUs) subsequently die without leaving hospital. It is unclear how many of these deaths are preventable. Ward-based management following discharge from ICU is an area that patients and healthcare staff are concerned about. The primary aim of REFLECT (Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment) is to develop an intervention plan to reduce in-hospital mortality rates in patients who have been discharged from ICU. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: REFLECT is a multicentre mixed-methods exploratory study examining ward care delivery to adult patients discharged from ICU. The study will be made up of four substudies. Medical notes of patients who were discharged from ICU and subsequently died will be examined using a retrospective case records review (RCRR) technique. Patients and their relatives will be interviewed about their post-ICU care, including relatives of patients who died in hospital following ICU discharge. Staff involved in the care of patients post-ICU discharge will be interviewed about the care of this patient group. The medical records of patients who survived their post-ICU stay will also be reviewed using the RCRR technique. The analyses of the substudies will be both descriptive and use a modified grounded theory approach to identify emerging themes. The evidence generated in these four substudies will form the basis of the intervention development, which will take place through stakeholder and clinical expert meetings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained through the Wales Research and Ethics Committee 4 (17/WA/0107). We aim to disseminate the findings through international conferences, international peer-reviewed journals and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14658054.

Indexed as

Critical CareHospital MortalityPatient DischargeHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicResearch DesignRetrospective Studiescritical caremixed methodsoutcomeprotocol

Identifiers

PMID30813113
PMCPMC6347880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.