Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30812066›Full record

SynthesisPsycho-oncology2019

Conceptual framework for living with and beyond cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Clair Le Boutillier, Stephanie Archer, Claire Barry, Alex King, Louise Mansfield, Catherine Urch

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psycho-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The use of CAM products, practices, and practitioners by long-term endometrial cancer survivors in Australia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clair Le BoutillierDepartment of Surgery, Cardiovascular and Cancer, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3665-0315
Stephanie ArcherDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1349-7178
Claire BarryDepartment of Surgery, Cardiovascular and Cancer, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9839-1403
Alex KingDepartment of Surgery, Cardiovascular and Cancer, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9050-1092
Louise MansfieldDepartment of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4332-4366
Catherine UrchDepartment of Surgery, Cardiovascular and Cancer, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4251-9113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe concept of living with and beyond cancer is now emerging in policy and literature. Rather than viewing this notion simply as a linear timeline, developing an agreed understanding of the lived experience of people affected by cancer will aid the development of person-centred models of care.

methodsA systematic review was conducted. The review question was "What does the term 'living with and beyond cancer' mean to people affected by cancer?" The protocol for the review was preregistered in the PROSPERO database (PROSPERO CRD42017059860). All included studies were qualitative, so narrative synthesis was used to integrate descriptions and definitions of living with and beyond cancer into an empirically based conceptual framework.

resultsOut of 2345 papers that were identified and 180 that were reviewed, a total of 73 papers were included. The synthesis yielded three interlinked themes: Adversity (realising cancer), Restoration (readjusting life with cancer), and Compatibility (reconciling cancer), resulting in the ARC framework.

conclusionsThree themes describe the experience of living with and beyond cancer: adversity, restoration, and compatibility. The ARC framework provides an empirically informed grounding for future research and practice in supportive cancer care for this population.

Indexed as

Social SupportActivities of Daily LivingCancer SurvivorsHumansNarrationNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSocioeconomic Factorscancerconceptual frameworkliving with and beyondoncologypatient experiencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30812066
PMCPMC6594071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.