Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30812052›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2019

Stochastic Counterfactual Risk Analysis for the Vulnerability Assessment of Cyber-Physical Attacks on Electricity Distribution Infrastructure Networks.

Edward J Oughton, Daniel Ralph, Raghav Pant, Eireann Leverett, Jennifer Copic, Scott Thacker, Rabia Dada, Simon Ruffle, Michelle Tuveson, Jim W Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Assessing the Sensitivities of Input-Output Methods for Natural Hazard-Induced Power Outage Macroeconomic Impacts.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Edward J OughtonEnvironmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2766-008X
Daniel RalphCambridge Centre for Risk Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Raghav PantEnvironmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4648-5261
Eireann LeverettCambridge Centre for Risk Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jennifer CopicCambridge Centre for Risk Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Scott ThackerEnvironmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rabia DadaCambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Simon RuffleCambridge Centre for Risk Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Michelle TuvesonCambridge Centre for Risk Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jim W HallEnvironmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2024-9191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In December 2015, a cyber-physical attack took place on the Ukrainian electricity distribution network. This is regarded as one of the first cyber-physical attacks on electricity infrastructure to have led to a substantial power outage and is illustrative of the increasing vulnerability of Critical National Infrastructure to this type of malicious activity. Few data points, coupled with the rapid emergence of cyber phenomena, has held back the development of resilience analytics of cyber-physical attacks, relative to many other threats. We propose to overcome data limitations by applying stochastic counterfactual risk analysis as part of a new vulnerability assessment framework. The method is developed in the context of the direct and indirect socioeconomic impacts of a Ukrainian-style cyber-physical attack taking place on the electricity distribution network serving London and its surrounding regions. A key finding is that if decision-makers wish to mitigate major population disruptions, then they must invest resources more-or-less equally across all substations, to prevent the scaling of a cyber-physical attack. However, there are some substations associated with higher economic value due to their support of other Critical National Infrastructures assets, which justifies the allocation of additional cyber security investment to reduce the chance of cascading failure. Further cyber-physical vulnerability research must address the tradeoffs inherent in a system made up of multiple institutions with different strategic risk mitigation objectives and metrics of value, such as governments, infrastructure operators, and commercial consumers of infrastructure services.

Indexed as

Critical National Infrastructurecyber-physical attackinfrastructure

Identifiers

PMID30812052
PMCPMC6850035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.