Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30811782›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Disparity level identification using the voxel-wise Gabor model of fMRI data.

Yuan Li, Chunping Hou, Li Yao, Chuncheng Zhang, Hongna Zheng, Jiacai Zhang, Zhiying Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuan LiSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Chunping HouSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Li YaoState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Chuncheng ZhangInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2459-5910
Hongna ZhengCollege of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Jiacai ZhangCollege of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Zhiying LongState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-5832

Funding

Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities 2017XTCX04Interdiscipline Research Fund of Beijing Normal UniversityKey Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 61731003National Natural Science Foundation of China 61471262National Natural Science Foundation of China 61520106002National Natural Science Foundation of China 61671067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceiving disparities is the intuitive basis for our understanding of the physical world. Although many electrophysiology studies have revealed the disparity-tuning characteristics of the neurons in the visual areas of the macaque brain, neuron population responses to disparity processing have seldom been investigated. Many disparity studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have revealed the disparity-selective visual areas in the human brain. However, it is unclear how to characterize neuron population disparity-tuning responses using fMRI technique. In the present study, we constructed three voxel-wise encoding Gabor models to predict the voxel responses to novel disparity levels and used a decoding method to identify the new disparity levels from population responses in the cortex. Among the three encoding models, the fine-coarse model (FCM) that used fine/coarse disparities to fit the voxel responses to disparities outperformed the single model and uncrossed-crossed model. Moreover, the FCM demonstrated high accuracy in predicting voxel responses in V3A complex and high accuracy in identifying novel disparities from responses in V3A complex. Our results suggest that the FCM can better characterize the voxel responses to disparities than the other two models and V3A complex is a critical visual area for representing disparity information.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdultFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, VisualVisual CortexYoung AdultdisparityfMRIGaboridentifyvoxel-wise encoding model

Identifiers

PMID30811782
PMCPMC6865565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.