Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30811548›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

deepBioWSD: effective deep neural word sense disambiguation of biomedical text data.

Ahmad Pesaranghader, Stan Matwin, Marina Sokolova, Ali Pesaranghader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Unified Medical Language System SPECIALIST Lexicon and Lexical Tools: Development and applications.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmad PesaranghaderFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Stan MatwinFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Marina SokolovaInstitute for Big Data Analytics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Ali PesaranghaderSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn biomedicine, there is a wealth of information hidden in unstructured narratives such as research articles and clinical reports. To exploit these data properly, a word sense disambiguation (WSD) algorithm prevents downstream difficulties in the natural language processing applications pipeline. Supervised WSD algorithms largely outperform un- or semisupervised and knowledge-based methods; however, they train 1 separate classifier for each ambiguous term, necessitating a large number of expert-labeled training data, an unattainable goal in medical informatics. To alleviate this need, a single model that shares statistical strength across all instances and scales well with the vocabulary size is desirable. MATERIALS AND

methodsBuilt on recent advances in deep learning, our deepBioWSD model leverages 1 single bidirectional long short-term memory network that makes sense prediction for any ambiguous term. In the model, first, the Unified Medical Language System sense embeddings will be computed using their text definitions; and then, after initializing the network with these embeddings, it will be trained on all (available) training data collectively. This method also considers a novel technique for automatic collection of training data from PubMed to (pre)train the network in an unsupervised manner.

resultsWe use the MSH WSD dataset to compare WSD algorithms, with macro and micro accuracies employed as evaluation metrics. deepBioWSD outperforms existing models in biomedical text WSD by achieving the state-of-the-art performance of 96.82% for macro accuracy.

conclusionsApart from the disambiguation improvement and unsupervised training, deepBioWSD depends on considerably less number of expert-labeled data as it learns the target and the context terms jointly. These merit deepBioWSD to be conveniently deployable in real-time biomedical applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNatural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerVocabulary, ControlledAlgorithmsBiological OntologiesData MiningDatasets as TopicMedical Subject HeadingsSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineUnified Medical Language Systembidirectional long short-term memory networkbiomedical text miningdeep neural networksword sense disambiguationzero-shot learning

Identifiers

PMID30811548
PMCPMC7787358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.