Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Michael T LaubDepartment of Biology Howard Hughes Medical Institute Graduate Program in Microbiology Graduate Program in Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Georgina M MaceDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, Center for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8965-5211
Piali SenguptaDepartment of Biology and National Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7468-0035
Ann M StockDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0446-8079
Andrew F ReadCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Departments of Biology and Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7604-7903
Harmit S MalikDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6005-0016
Mark EstelleSection of Cell and Developmental Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2613-8652
Sally LowellMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-9480
Jonathan KimmelmanStudies of Translation, Ethics, and Medicine, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-6779
Funding
T cell Development and RegenerationZIABC011633 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BHANDOOLA, AVINASH · 2015 to 2025
$20.5M
STRUCTURE/FUNCTION OF RESPONSE REGULATOR PROTEINSR01GM047958 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI STOCK, ANN M. · 1992 to 2017
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047958
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Periodicals as TopicAMP-Activated Protein KinasesAnimal ExperimentationAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArabidopsisBiological TransportBiologyChiropteraClathrin-Coated VesiclesDrosophila melanogasterDrug Resistance, BacterialEndocytosisEscherichia coliFlight, AnimalHumansAMP-Activated Protein KinasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsPheromonesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The PLOS Biology XV Collection: 15 Years of Exceptional Science Highlighted across 12 Months. · full record | OpenQuestion