ArticlePloS one2019
Automatic diagnostics of tuberculosis using convolutional neural networks analysis of MODS digital images.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel TB smear microscopy automation system in detecting acid-fast bacilli for tuberculosis - A multi-center double blind study.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Trial
- Article
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis Using an Intelligent Microscopy Scanner and Image Recognition Model for Improved Acid-Fast Bacilli Detection in Smears.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Paediatric Tuberculosis.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- A Study ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Low-cost 3D-printed inverted microscope to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a MODS culture.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Article
- Exploring perceptions of healthcare technologies enabled by artificial intelligence: an online, scenario-based survey.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Parental Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence-Driven Precision Medicine Technologies in Pediatric Healthcare.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Use of Digital Technology to Enhance Tuberculosis Control: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Tuberculosis Diagnostics and Localization in Chest X-Rays via Deep Learning Models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2020Article
- CheXLocNet: Automatic localization of pneumothorax in chest radiographs using deep convolutional neural networks.PloS one · 2020Article
- An ANN model for the differential diagnosis of tuberculosis and sarcoidosis.Bioinformation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tuberculosis is an infectious disease that causes ill health and death in millions of people each year worldwide. Timely diagnosis and treatment is key to full patient recovery. The Microscopic Observed Drug Susceptibility (MODS) is a test to diagnose TB infection and drug susceptibility directly from a sputum sample in 7-10 days with a low cost and high sensitivity and specificity, based on the visual recognition of specific growth cording patterns of M. Tuberculosis in a broth culture. Despite its advantages, MODS is still limited in remote, low resource settings, because it requires permanent and trained technical staff for the image-based diagnostics. Hence, it is important to develop alternative solutions, based on reliable automated analysis and interpretation of MODS cultures. In this study, we trained and evaluated a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic interpretation of MODS cultures digital images. The CNN was trained on a dataset of 12,510 MODS positive and negative images obtained from three different laboratories, where it achieved 96.63 +/- 0.35% accuracy, and a sensitivity and specificity ranging from 91% to 99%, when validated across held-out laboratory datasets. The model's learned features resemble visual cues used by expert diagnosticians to interpret MODS cultures, suggesting that our model may have the ability to generalize and scale. It performed robustly when validated across held-out laboratory datasets and can be improved upon with data from new laboratories. This CNN can assist laboratory personnel, in low resource settings, and is a step towards facilitating automated diagnostics access to critical areas in developing countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.