Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30811406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes-Estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012.

Eline L Korenromp, Jane Rowley, Monica Alonso, Maeve B Mello, N Saman Wijesooriya, S Guy Mahiané, Naoko Ishikawa, Linh-Vi Le, Morkor Newman-Owiredu, Nico Nagelkerke and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 192 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
32.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 470 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Clinical and serological outcomes of syphilis: an 18-year retrospective cohort study on predictors of treatment response and seroreversion in Türkiye.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Gestational and congenital syphilis in a Brazilian harbor city: A population-based study of prevalence, determinants, and adverse neonatal outcomes.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Indicators from training healthcare providers on WHO-recommended best practices in prenatal care in Brazil: A before-and-after study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  14. Increase in congenital syphilis in the European Union and European Economic Area, 2015 to 2024 - time to scale-up public health responses.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Key Considerations in Evaluating Syphilis Therapeutics.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Eline L KorenrompAvenir Health, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5301-8461
Jane RowleyIndependent consultant, London, United Kingdom.
Monica AlonsoDepartment of Communicable Diseases and Environmental Determinants of Health, Pan-American Health Organization, Washington DC, United States of America.
Maeve B MelloDepartment of Communicable Diseases and Environmental Determinants of Health, Pan-American Health Organization, Washington DC, United States of America.
N Saman WijesooriyaIndependent Consultant, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3447-0222
S Guy MahianéAvenir Health, Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States of America.
Naoko IshikawaWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, the Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-2701-6892
Linh-Vi LeWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, the Philippines.
Morkor Newman-OwireduWorld Health Organization, Sub-Saharan Africa Office, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Nico NagelkerkeIndependent Consultant, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lori NewmanUSA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cambodia Country Office, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Mary KambUSA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cambodia Country Office, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Nathalie BroutetUSA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Melanie M TaylorUSA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1786-6295
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific · PHAvenir Health · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CG

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2007 the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the global initiative to eliminate mother-to-child transmission of syphilis (congenital syphilis, or CS). To assess progress towards the goal of <50 CS cases per 100,000 live births, we generated regional and global estimates of maternal and congenital syphilis for 2016 and updated the 2012 estimates.

methodsMaternal syphilis estimates were generated using the Spectrum-STI model, fitted to sentinel surveys and routine testing of pregnant women during antenatal care (ANC) and other representative population data. Global and regional estimates of CS used the same approach as previous WHO estimates.

resultsThe estimated global maternal syphilis prevalence in 2016 was 0.69% (95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.81%) resulting in a global CS rate of 473 (385-561) per 100,000 live births and 661,000 (538,000-784,000) total CS cases, including 355,000 (290,000-419,000) adverse birth outcomes (ABO) and 306,000 (249,000-363,000) non-clinical CS cases (infants without clinical signs born to un-treated mothers). The ABOs included 143,000 early fetal deaths and stillbirths, 61,000 neonatal deaths, 41,000 preterm or low-birth weight births, and 109,000 infants with clinical CS. Of these ABOs- 203,000 (57%) occurred in pregnant women attending ANC but not screened for syphilis; 74,000 (21%) in mothers not enrolled in ANC, 55,000 (16%) in mothers screened but not treated, and 23,000 (6%) in mothers enrolled, screened and treated. The revised 2012 estimates were 0.70% (95% CI: 0.63-0.77%) maternal prevalence, and 748,000 CS cases (539 per 100,000 live births) including 397,000 (361,000-432,000) ABOs. The estimated decrease in CS case rates between 2012 and 2016 reflected increased access to ANC and to syphilis screening and treatment.

conclusionsCongenital syphilis decreased worldwide between 2012 and 2016, although maternal prevalence was stable. Achieving global CS elimination, however, will require improving access to early syphilis screening and treatment in ANC, clinically monitoring all women diagnosed with syphilis and their infants, improving partner management, and reducing syphilis prevalence in the general population by expanding testing, treatment and partner referral beyond ANC.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessFemaleGlobal HealthHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy OutcomePrevalenceStillbirthSyphilisSyphilis, Congenital

Identifiers

PMID30811406
PMCPMC6392238
OpenAlexW2917519553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.