ArticlePloS one2019
Improving preterm newborn identification in low-resource settings with machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02738892 (Preventing Preterm Birth in Zambia), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Preventing Preterm Birth in Zambia
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Influence of different methods for calculating gestational age at birth on prematurity and small for gestational age proportions: a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Pooled it
- Association between HIV antiretroviral therapy and preterm birth based on antenatal ultrasound gestational age determination: a comparative analysis.AIDS (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Artificial Intelligence for Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of machine learning models for early prediction of small for-gestational-age births using maternal sociodemographic and obstetric data.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for predicting Major Obstetric Emergencies: Current Evidence, Clinical Translation, and Future Directions.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Precision Unveiled in Unborn: A Cutting-Edge Hybrid Machine Learning Approach for Fetal Health State Classification.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2025Article
- Data science and artificial intelligence for maternal, newborn and child health: scoping review and thematic analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The Effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Gamified Intervention for Improving Maternal Health Outcomes Among Refugees and Underserved Women in Lebanon: Community Interventional Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Article
- Machine learning to predict the role of CHWs in shifting birth preferences away from homebirth in India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- The use of artificial intelligence in sexual and reproductive health: a comprehensive scoping review.npj women's health · 2025Article
- Evaluating the impact of engaging healthcare providers in an AI-based gamified mHealth intervention for improving maternal health outcomes among disadvantaged pregnant women in Lebanon.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Deep Learning in Predicting Preterm Birth: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024Article
- Predicting facility-based delivery in Zanzibar: The vulnerability of machine learning algorithms to adversarial attacks.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Gestational age assessed by optical skin reflection in low-birth-weight newborns: Applications in classification at birth.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in obstetrics.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- Predicting preterm birth using explainable machine learning in a prospective cohort of nulliparous and multiparous pregnant women.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Dense phenotyping from electronic health records enables machine learning-based prediction of preterm birth.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- Newborn Skin Maturity Medical Device Validation for Gestational Age Prediction: Clinical Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal death with estimated prevalence and associated mortality highest in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Accurate identification of preterm infants is important at the individual level for appropriate clinical intervention as well as at the population level for informed policy decisions and resource allocation. As early prenatal ultrasound is commonly not available in these settings, gestational age (GA) is often estimated using newborn assessment at birth. This approach assumes last menstrual period to be unreliable and birthweight to be unable to distinguish preterm infants from those that are small for gestational age (SGA). We sought to leverage machine learning algorithms incorporating maternal factors associated with SGA to improve accuracy of preterm newborn identification in LMIC settings. METHODS AND
findingsThis study uses data from an ongoing obstetrical cohort in Lusaka, Zambia that uses early pregnancy ultrasound to estimate GA. Our intent was to identify the best set of parameters commonly available at delivery to correctly categorize births as either preterm (<37 weeks) or term, compared to GA assigned by early ultrasound as the gold standard. Trained midwives conducted a newborn assessment (<72 hours) and collected maternal and neonatal data at the time of delivery or shortly thereafter. New Ballard Score (NBS), last menstrual period (LMP), and birth weight were used individually to assign GA at delivery and categorize each birth as either preterm or term. Additionally, machine learning techniques incorporated combinations of these measures with several maternal and newborn characteristics associated with prematurity and SGA to develop GA at delivery and preterm birth prediction models. The distribution and accuracy of all models were compared to early ultrasound dating. Within our live-born cohort to date (n = 862), the median GA at delivery by early ultrasound was 39.4 weeks (IQR: 38.3-40.3). Among assessed newborns with complete data included in this analysis (n = 468), the median GA by ultrasound was 39.6 weeks (IQR: 38.4-40.3). Using machine learning, we identified a combination of six accessible parameters (LMP, birth weight, twin delivery, maternal height, hypertension in labor, and HIV serostatus) that can be used by machine learning to outperform current GA prediction methods. For preterm birth prediction, this combination of covariates correctly classified >94% of newborns and achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9796.
conclusionsWe identified a parsimonious list of variables that can be used by machine learning approaches to improve accuracy of preterm newborn identification. Our best-performing model included LMP, birth weight, twin delivery, HIV serostatus, and maternal factors associated with SGA. These variables are all easily collected at delivery, reducing the skill and time required by the frontline health worker to assess GA.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02738892.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.