Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30811399›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Improving preterm newborn identification in low-resource settings with machine learning.

Katelyn J Rittenhouse, Bellington Vwalika, Alexander Keil, Jennifer Winston, Marie Stoner, Joan T Price, Monica Kapasa, Mulaya Mubambe, Vanilla Banda, Whyson Muunga and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02738892 (Preventing Preterm Birth in Zambia), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02738892 active not recruitingnot on this map

Preventing Preterm Birth in Zambia

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2015 to 2026Enrolled9,000ConditionsPregnancy, Stillbirth, Preterm Birth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Applications of artificial intelligence in obstetrics.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katelyn J RittenhouseUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5571-0793
Bellington VwalikaUniversity of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Alexander KeilUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-6107
Jennifer WinstonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
Marie StonerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
Joan T PriceUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
Monica KapasaUniversity of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mulaya MubambeUniversity of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Vanilla BandaUniversity of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Whyson MuungaUniversity of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Jeffrey S A StringerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9590-7216

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
UJMT – ORWH – Gazzetta, Issa-BoubeD43TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI William Checkley, Benjamin H. Chi · 2017 to 2026
$14.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
UNC Global Women’s Health FellowshipT32HD075731 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2013 to 2024
$2.4M
A Career Development Award in HIV-Associated Preterm Birth and its PreventionK01TW010857 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PRICE, JOAN · 2017 to 2021
$682k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009340FIC NIH HHS K01 TW010857NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD075731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal death with estimated prevalence and associated mortality highest in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Accurate identification of preterm infants is important at the individual level for appropriate clinical intervention as well as at the population level for informed policy decisions and resource allocation. As early prenatal ultrasound is commonly not available in these settings, gestational age (GA) is often estimated using newborn assessment at birth. This approach assumes last menstrual period to be unreliable and birthweight to be unable to distinguish preterm infants from those that are small for gestational age (SGA). We sought to leverage machine learning algorithms incorporating maternal factors associated with SGA to improve accuracy of preterm newborn identification in LMIC settings. METHODS AND

findingsThis study uses data from an ongoing obstetrical cohort in Lusaka, Zambia that uses early pregnancy ultrasound to estimate GA. Our intent was to identify the best set of parameters commonly available at delivery to correctly categorize births as either preterm (<37 weeks) or term, compared to GA assigned by early ultrasound as the gold standard. Trained midwives conducted a newborn assessment (<72 hours) and collected maternal and neonatal data at the time of delivery or shortly thereafter. New Ballard Score (NBS), last menstrual period (LMP), and birth weight were used individually to assign GA at delivery and categorize each birth as either preterm or term. Additionally, machine learning techniques incorporated combinations of these measures with several maternal and newborn characteristics associated with prematurity and SGA to develop GA at delivery and preterm birth prediction models. The distribution and accuracy of all models were compared to early ultrasound dating. Within our live-born cohort to date (n = 862), the median GA at delivery by early ultrasound was 39.4 weeks (IQR: 38.3-40.3). Among assessed newborns with complete data included in this analysis (n = 468), the median GA by ultrasound was 39.6 weeks (IQR: 38.4-40.3). Using machine learning, we identified a combination of six accessible parameters (LMP, birth weight, twin delivery, maternal height, hypertension in labor, and HIV serostatus) that can be used by machine learning to outperform current GA prediction methods. For preterm birth prediction, this combination of covariates correctly classified >94% of newborns and achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9796.

conclusionsWe identified a parsimonious list of variables that can be used by machine learning approaches to improve accuracy of preterm newborn identification. Our best-performing model included LMP, birth weight, twin delivery, HIV serostatus, and maternal factors associated with SGA. These variables are all easily collected at delivery, reducing the skill and time required by the frontline health worker to assess GA.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02738892.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMachine LearningMaleNeonatal ScreeningPregnancyPremature BirthZambia

Identifiers

PMID30811399
PMCPMC6392324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.