Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30811396›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Development and validation of influenza forecasting for 64 temperate and tropical countries.

Sarah C Kramer, Jeffrey Shaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Noisy periodicity in tropical respiratory disease dynamics.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Transmission-dynamics models for the SARS Coronavirus-2.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah C KramerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6177-2309
Jeffrey ShamanDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7216-7809

Funding

Development and Dissemination of Operational Real-Time Respiratory Virus ForecastU01GM110748 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHAMAN, JEFFREY L · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Interdisciplinary Training in Climate and HealthT32ES023770 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHAMAN, JEFFREY L · 2014 to 2019
$1.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES023770NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM110748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate forecasts of influenza incidence can be used to inform medical and public health decision-making and response efforts. However, forecasting systems are uncommon in most countries, with a few notable exceptions. Here we use publicly available data from the World Health Organization to generate retrospective forecasts of influenza peak timing and peak intensity for 64 countries, including 18 tropical and subtropical countries. We find that accurate and well-calibrated forecasts can be generated for countries in temperate regions, with peak timing and intensity accuracy exceeding 50% at four and two weeks prior to the predicted epidemic peak, respectively. Forecasts are significantly less accurate in the tropics and subtropics for both peak timing and intensity. This work indicates that, in temperate regions around the world, forecasts can be generated with sufficient lead time to prepare for upcoming outbreak peak incidence.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDisease OutbreaksEpidemicsForecastingHumansIncidenceInfluenza, HumanModels, StatisticalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30811396
PMCPMC6411231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.