Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30811357›Full record

SynthesisClinical orthopaedics and related research2019

Is There a Difference in Infection Risk Between Single and Multiple Doses of Prophylactic Antibiotics? A Meta-analysis.

Sean P Ryan, Beau J Kildow, Timothy L Tan, Javad Parvizi, Michael P Bolognesi, Thorsten M Seyler, American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Research Committee

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Antibiotics for preventing infection at the surgical site: Single dose vs. multiple doses.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Type of antibiotic but not the duration of prophylaxis correlates with rates of fracture-related infection.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotic resistance: still a cause of concern?OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021
    Article
  14. Contemporary Strategies to Prevent Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Editorial Comment: 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society Proceedings.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2019
    Article
  18. Infection Prophylaxis in Urological Diagnostic and Surgical Procedures - A narrative review and recommendations.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean P RyanS. P. Ryan, B. J. Kildow, M. P. Bolognesi, T. M. Seyler, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA T. L. Tan, J. Parvizi, Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Beau J Kildow
Timothy L Tan
Javad Parvizi
Michael P Bolognesi
Thorsten M Seyler
American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Research Committee
Center for Clinical Research (United States) · USMDS Associates (United States) · USRothman Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevention of surgical site infection guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently recommended that only a single dose of preoperative antibiotics be administered to patients undergoing clean-contaminated procedures based on data from a variety of surgical disciplines. For orthopaedic procedures, where postoperative infections can have significant consequences, the existing evidence for this recommendation is widely debated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Is there a difference in postoperative infection risk when utilizing a single dose of preoperative antibiotics compared with multiple doses of perioperative antibiotics for orthopaedic procedures where implants are placed?

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were systematically reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of a single dose of preoperative antibiotics compared with pre- and postoperative prophylaxis from 1980 to 2017 for all orthopaedic procedures where implants were being placed. Infection (both superficial and deep) as a primary outcome through all available followup was required for inclusion. Fourteen RCTs detailing 9691 orthopaedic procedures were included for analysis, including seven arthroplasty, one spine, and six general orthopaedic trials (two specific to hip fracture fixation). Pooled infection outcomes were analyzed with random-effects modeling in light of study heterogeneity. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool as well as a funnel plot for publication bias, and quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Bias was largely uncertain; however, a high risk of bias was noted in four studies. No significant overall publication bias was noted. The quality of evidence was determined to be very low based on the GRADE tool, downgraded based on risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Despite the quality of evidence, the data were pooled in light of the current recommendations from the CDC to critically evaluate the recommendation that a single dose of antibiotics be utilized.

resultsThere were no differences in infection risk between single- versus multiple-dose groups (single: 83 of 4263 [2%], multiple: 101 of 5428 [2%]; odds ratio, 0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.51]; p = 0.740, I = 36% for statistical heterogeneity).

conclusionsThere is no difference in infection risk between a single dose and multiple doses of perioperative antibiotics for orthopaedic procedures where implants are utilized, consistent with recent recommendations. However, the quality of evidence for orthopaedic procedures is low, and a randomized study with a sufficient sample size is needed to examine the issue before universal adoption of a single antibiotic dose. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioOrthopedic ProceduresProstheses and ImplantsRisk FactorsSurgical Wound InfectionTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30811357
PMCPMC6999965
OpenAlexW2911987889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.