Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30811306›Full record

ArticleJournal of global oncology2019

Clinical Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Testing in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer by Physicians: Survey of US and International Patterns.

Matthew Peters, Edward S Kim, Vera Hirsch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simultaneous Durvalumab and Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III PACIFIC-2 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Testing forOncoTargets and therapy · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew PetersMacquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Edward S KimLevine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC.
Vera HirschMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGuidelines recommend testing for EGFR mutation at diagnosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer to guide treatment. Two surveys, 18 months apart, aimed to identify changes in EGFR mutation testing and treatment practices in non-small-cell lung cancer.

methodsThe first survey of 562 physicians from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States was conducted between December 2014 and January 2015. The second, between July and August 2016, surveyed 707 physicians in the same countries with the addition of China; China was excluded from year-on-year comparisons.

resultsGlobally (excluding China), physicians requested EGFR mutation testing in 80% (excluding China; 2015: 81%) of patients before first-line therapy. In 2016, 18% of results were not received before initiating treatment, a significant improvement over 2015 (23%). Reasons for not testing included tumor histology, insufficient tissue, poor performance status, and long turnaround time, although this had significantly improved in 2016 from 2015. Prolonging of survival/extending life was deemed the most important therapy goal in first-line treatment of both cohorts.

conclusionImprovements in availability of test results before first-line therapy were seen, but incomplete implementation of guidelines is still observed, resulting in a large proportion of patients not receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment on the basis of mutation status. The reasons for not testing remained the same, year-on-year: tumor histology, insufficient tissue, poor performance status, and long test turnaround time. Receiving timely results must be addressed, if treatment parity for eligible patients can be achieved. Physician education and closer guideline concordance are key steps to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

MutationAsiaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsEuropeGenetic TestingHumansLung NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Protein Kinase InhibitorsSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival AnalysisUnited StatesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30811306
PMCPMC6426511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.