Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30810883›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2019

Application of Internet+-based Tsinghua PINS Remote Tech to improve sacral neuromodulation programming procedure.

Peng Zhang, Yao-Guang Zhang, Li Min Liao, Jian-Wu Shen, Yun-Bo Yang, Jian-Zhong Zhang, Li-Yang Wu, Xiao-Dong Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peng ZhangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China. seabottlezp@126.com.
Yao-Guang ZhangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Li Min LiaoDepartment of Urology, China Rehabilitation Research Centre, Rehabilitation School of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100068, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Wu ShenUrology Department of Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yun-Bo YangUrology Department, Hebei Yanda hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Zhong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Li-Yang WuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Dong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from High Level Technical Talents in Beijing Health System 2015‑3‑030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the feasibility and safety of the Tsinghua PINS Remote Tech to facilitate sacral neuromodulation programming procedure.

methodFor 22 patients who had previously participated in the phase III clinical trial for treating overactive bladder with the Tsinghua PINS sacral neuromodulation system during several Hospital, PINS Remote Tech was applied to perform postoperative parameter adjustment in order to evaluate the safety and reliability of this new technique. Telephone surveys on Remote Tech-related questionnaires were also conducted.

results17/22 patients underwent 26 parameter adjustments, average adjustment frequency was 1.53 times per person; the average adjustment time was 23.4 ± 5.1 min (15-32 min). The total effective rate of the Remote control was 14/17 (82.3%). 7/17 (41.1%) patients' symptoms recurrence due to not knowing how to handle patient controller, these patients were instructed on how to use it correctly through Remote Tech even without reprogramming it. Other 10 patients received reprogramming. There was no discomfort during and after parameter adjustment. The questionnaire survey showed that the remote technology saved patients' time and lowered financial costs, significantly improved patient satisfaction. All patients expressed their willingness to recommend it to other patients.

conclusionThe PINS Remote Tech can significantly reduce the financial cost and provide a remote reprogram control service that is as safe and reliable as outpatient program control.

Indexed as

InternetAdultElectric Stimulation TherapyElectrodes, ImplantedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLumbosacral PlexusMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineUrinary Bladder, OveractiveLong-term efficacyRemote TechSacral neuromodulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.