ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2019
Commentary on the Current Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Lupus Nephritis Flare.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic relevance of persistent haematuria in patients with lupus nephritis.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- The Inflammatory and Oxidative Status of Newly Diagnosed Class III and Class IV Lupus Nephritis, with Six-Month Follow-Up.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Role of the Oxidative State and Innate Immunity Mediated by TLR7 and TLR9 in Lupus Nephritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Primary Membranous Nephropathy and Subnephrotic Proteinuria.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Microhematuria Enhances the Risks of Relapse and Renal Progression in Primary Membranous Nephropathy.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Glomerular Hematuria: Cause or Consequence of Renal Inflammation?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewLupus nephritis flare is a frequent complication in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Recognizing disease activity is crucial in lupus nephritis management. Proteinuria magnitude and urine sediment change are major clinical indicators of lupus nephritis activity. This work updates these insights in light of recent findings regarding proteinuria quantification and urine sediment analyses. RECENT
findingsCurrently, BILAG and SLEDAI estimate proteinuria magnitude based on the protein/creatinine ratio of "spot" (single void collections) or "intended" 24-h urine collections without specifying the extent to which the collection approaches a 24-h collection. As discussed here, and based on our recently published work, these approaches often incur serious errors that can adversely affect SLE patient management. Also incorporated into this work is a new analysis of the clinical significance of urine sediment hematuria and pyuria changes with regard to recent-onset SLE glomerulonephritis (GN) flare. This analysis is based on a prospective study of urine sediment changes in the Ohio SLE Study, which was an NIH-sponsored prospective observational study of SLE GN patients with SLE flare of recent onset. We propose that BILAG and SLEDAI renal flare criteria can be made more rigorous by incorporating recently published insights into proteinuria quantification using the protein/creatinine ratio of an intended 24-h urine collection that is at least 50% complete based on its creatinine content. Also proposed are new insights into the interpretation of urine sediment hematuria and pyuria based on findings from the Ohio SLE Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30810824What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.