ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2019
Predicting protein tertiary structure and its uncertainty analysis via particle swarm sampling.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Protein Tertiary Structure via Regularized Template Classification Techniques.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- BioShell 3.0: Library for Processing Structural Biology Data.Biomolecules · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We discuss the relationship between the problem of protein tertiary structure prediction from the amino acid sequence and the uncertainty analysis. The algorithm presented in this paper belongs to the category of decoy-based modeling, where different known protein models are used to establish a low dimensional space via principal component analysis. The low dimensional space is utilized to perform an energy optimization via a family of very explorative particle swarm optimizers to find the global minimum. The aim of this procedure is to get a representative sample of the nonlinear equivalent region, that is, protein models that have their energy lower than a certain energy bound. The posterior analysis of this family provides very valuable information about the backbone structure of the native conformation and its possible alternate states. This methodology has the advantage of being simple and fast and can help refine the tertiary protein structure. We comprehensively illustrate the performance of our algorithm on one protein from the CASP-9 protein structure prediction experiment. We also provide a theoretical analysis of the energy landscape found in the tertiary structure protein inverse problem, explaining why model reduction techniques (principal component analysis in this case) serve to alleviate the ill-posed character of this high dimensional optimization problem. In addition, we expand the computational benchmark with a summary of other CASP-9 proteins in the Appendix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.