ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2019
Insights into DNA polymerase δ's mechanism for accurate DNA replication.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coordinated transfer of DNA between Pol θ and Pol δ resets microhomology choice during double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Mutations in DNA polymerase δ subunit 1 co-segregate with CMD2-type resistance to Cassava Mosaic Geminiviruses.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Structural and Molecular Kinetic Features of Activities of DNA Polymerases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Genome-Protecting Compounds as Potential Geroprotectors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our study examines the mechanisms by which DNA polymerase (pol) δ faithfully replicates DNA. To better understand this process, we have performed all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of several DNA pol δ systems to identify conformational changes occurring prior to chemistry and investigate mechanisms by which mutations in the fingers domain (R696W and A699Q) lower fidelity. Our results indicate that, without the incoming nucleotide, a distinct open conformation occurs defined by a rotation in the fingers. The closed form, adopted when the correct nucleotide is bound, appears best organized for chemistry when three magnesium ions coordinate protein and DNA residues in the active site. Removing an unusual third metal ion from the polymerase active site causes shifting in the fingers and thumb as well as stimulating specific exonuclease β-hairpin-DNA interactions that fray the primer terminus base pair. These changes suggest that dissociation of the third divalent ion (metal ion 'C') signals a transfer of the DNA primer from the polymerase to the exonuclease active site and implies a role for the β-hairpin in DNA switching. Analysis of β-hairpin movement in several systems reveals a dependence on active-site changes and suggests how Lys444 and Tyr446 present in the β-hairpin can affect proofreading. Analysis of A699Q and R696W pol δ mutant systems reveal marked differences in the open-to-closed transition as well as β-hairpin repositioning that explain reduced nucleotide selectivity and higher error rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30810803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.