Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30810785›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

New mobile-bearing TKA with unique ball and socket post-cam mechanism offers similar function and stability with better prosthesis fit and gap balancing compared to an established fixed-bearing prosthesis.

Vivek Tiwari, Prashant Meshram, Chang Kyu Park, Vivek Bansal, Tae Kyun Kim

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vivek TiwariJoint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173, Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Prashant MeshramJoint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173, Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Chang Kyu ParkJoint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173, Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Vivek BansalJoint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173, Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Tae Kyun KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. osktk2000@yahoo.com.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA mobile-bearing (MB) posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system with ball and socket post-cam mechanism has been developed with the aims of better prosthesis fit and enhanced stability. However, the data are limited to compare its clinical outcomes with an already established fixed-bearing (FB) implant design.

methodsThis is a prospective randomized study comparing 260 patients in the MB group and 133 patients in FB group with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Intraoperative variables, post-operative functional outcomes and incidence of adverse events were compared.

resultsMB group showed better prosthesis fit as the incidence of over-hang of femoral component at junction (medial: 1% vs. 5% and lateral: 2% vs 4%, p < 0.001) and trochlea (medial: 2% vs 30%, p = 0.042 and lateral: 13% vs 21%, p = 0.015) was less than FB group. MB group also showed better gap balancing as the incidence of medio-lateral gap difference more than 2 mm was less in flexion (2.3% vs. 16%, p < 0.001) and extension (3.1% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.005). Post-operative functional outcomes and incidence of adverse events showed no difference between the two groups at 2 years.

conclusionsNew MB design offers similar functional outcomes and stability along with better intraoperative prosthesis fit and gap balancing compared to an established fixed-bearing design. Hence, this new MB design could be an alternative prosthesis of choice for posterior-stabilized TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionFunctionMobile bearingOutcomeProsthesis fitTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID30810785
OpenAlexW2915281237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.