ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2019
[Palliative long-term urinary bladder drainage: the uro-geriatric point of view].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Quality of life for wearers of a suprapubic or transurethral bladder catheter as lifelong permanent care].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A serious voiding disorder or urinary incontinence represent indications for long-term catheterization of the urinary bladder. Treatment by a transurethral or suprapubic bladder catheter for life-long bladder drainage is accompanied by technical short-term complications and long-term sequelae. The mortality risk associated with inserting a suprapubic catheter is approximately 2% due to an incorrect bladder puncture. Long-term consequences of life-long bladder drainage are hematuria, infection, spasms, stone formation, obstruction, catheter loss, risk of falls and automanipulation especially in cognitively impaired persons. These constitute frequent reasons for emergency treatment or hospitalization. Further problem areas are dependency on caregivers to perform the catheter change and dermal problems in the area of the fistula stoma. To what extent this limits the quality of life of those affected remains unclear up to now. The acute complications and the long-term consequences of life-long bladder drainage make careful decision-making necessary after other therapeutic options have failed, are not appropriate or not desired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.