Trial reportJAMA cardiology2019
Baseline Characteristics and Risk Profiles of Participants in the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01471522 (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA)
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Performance of CMR, SPECT, and PET Imaging for the Identification of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Death and Myocardial Infarction Stratified by Stable and Unstable Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2020Pooled it
- Additive prognostic value of functional performance to coronary artery anatomy: the ISCHEMIA trial.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2026Trial
- Use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention and associated outcomes in the ISCHEMIA trial.American heart journal · 2025Trial
- Comparative Prognosis by Stress ECG and Stress Imaging: Results From the ISCHEMIA Trial.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Trial
- Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Complete Angina Relief in Symptomatic Patients in the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Moderate or Severe Myocardial Ischemia: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2025Trial
- Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Trial
- Relationship Between Severity of Ischemia and Coronary Artery Disease for Different Stress Test Modalities in the ISCHEMIA Trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2024Trial
- Atherosclerosis quantification and cardiovascular risk: the ISCHEMIA trial.European heart journal · 2024Trial
- Cardiometabolic Co-morbidity Burden and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease in the ISCHEMIA Trials.The American journal of cardiology · 2024Trial
- Variation in Health Status With Invasive vs Conservative Management of Chronic Coronary Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Trial
- Sex Differences in Revascularization, Treatment Goals, and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Ischemia With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2023Trial
- Causes of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death in the ISCHEMIA trial.American heart journal · 2022Trial
- Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Outcomes With Invasive Versus Conservative Management of Chronic Coronary Disease in ISCHEMIA.Circulation · 2022Trial
- Predictors of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Trial
- Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA Trial Based on Coronary Artery Disease and Ischemia Severity.Circulation · 2021Trial
- Comparison of Days Alive Out of Hospital With Initial Invasive vs Conservative Management: A Prespecified Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Trial.JAMA cardiology · 2021Trial
- CT Angiography Followed by Invasive Angiography in Patients With Moderate or Severe Ischemia-Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2021Trial
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
28 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: It is unknown whether coronary revascularization, when added to optimal medical therapy, improves prognosis in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) at increased risk of cardiovascular events owing to moderate or severe ischemia. Objective: To describe baseline characteristics of participants enrolled and randomized in the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial and to evaluate whether qualification by stress imaging or nonimaging exercise tolerance test (ETT) influenced risk profiles. Design, Setting, and Participants: The ISCHEMIA trial recruited patients with SIHD with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. Blinded coronary computed tomography angiography was performed in most participants and reviewed by a core laboratory to exclude left main stenosis of at least 50% or no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (<50% for imaging stress test and <70% for ETT). The study included 341 enrolling sites (320 randomizing) in 38 countries and patients with SIHD and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. Data presented were extracted on December 17, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Enrolled, excluded, and randomized participants' baseline characteristics. No clinical outcomes are reported. Results: A total of 8518 patients were enrolled, and 5179 were randomized. Common reasons for exclusion were core laboratory determination of insufficient ischemia, unprotected left main stenosis of at least 50%, or no stenosis that met study obstructive CAD criteria on study coronary computed tomography angiography. Randomized participants had a median age of 64 years, with 1168 women (22.6%), 1726 nonwhite participants (33.7%), 748 Hispanic participants (15.5%), 2122 with diabetes (41.0%), and 4643 with a history of angina (89.7%). Among the 3909 participants randomized after stress imaging, core laboratory assessment of ischemia severity (in 3901 participants) was severe in 1748 (44.8%), moderate in 1600 (41.0%), mild in 317 (8.1%) and none or uninterpretable in 236 (6.0%), Among the 1270 participants who were randomized after nonimaging ETT, core laboratory determination of ischemia severity (in 1266 participants) was severe (an eligibility criterion) in 1051 (83.0%), moderate in 101 (8.0%), mild in 34 (2.7%) and none or uninterpretable in 80 (6.3%). Among the 3912 of 5179 randomized participants who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography, 79.0% had multivessel CAD (n = 2679 of 3390) and 86.8% had left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis (n = 3190 of 3677) (proximal in 46.8% [n = 1749 of 3739]). Participants undergoing ETT had greater frequency of 3-vessel CAD, LAD, and proximal LAD stenosis than participants undergoing stress imaging. Conclusions and Relevance: The ISCHEMIA trial randomized an SIHD population with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing, of whom most had multivessel CAD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471522.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.