ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2019
Fluoride release and uptake in enhanced bioactivity glass ionomer cement ("glass carbomer™") compared with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioactivity of Glass Carbomer Versus Conventional GICs in Sound Enamel and Dentine: A 12-Month SEM-EDS Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An in vitro study of fluoride-preloaded halloysite nanotubes to enhance the fluoride release in conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
- The development of resin-coating materials for enhancing elemental release of coated glass ionomer cements.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Effects of Ion-Releasing Materials on Dentine: Analysis of Microhardness, Appearance, and Chemical Composition.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Sol-Gel Technologies to Obtain Advanced Bioceramics for Dental Therapeutics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Remineralizing Ability of Resin Modified Glass Ionomers (RMGICs): A Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Fluoride Release in Chitosan-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements.International dental journal · 2022Article
- Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- External cervical resorption: Radiological diagnosis and literature (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- In Vitro Assessment of Long-Term Fluoride Ion Release from Nanofluorapatite.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Current aspects and prospects of glass ionomer cements for clinical dentistry.Yeungnam University journal of medicine · 2020Article
- The Disease Process, Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Cervical Resorption: A Review.Dentistry journal · 2020Review
- External root resorptions: cone-beam computed tomography assessment and histopathological characterization.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
- Evaluating fluoride uptake of dentin from different restorative materials at various time intervals - In vitro study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
- Comparative Fluoride Ion Release Pre and Postrecharge Situations among Three Different Pediatric Dental Restorative Materials: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo study the fluoride uptake and release properties of glass carbomer dental cements and compare them with those of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. MATERIALS AND
methodsThree materials were used, as follows: glass carbomer (Glass Fill), conventional glass ionomer (Chemfil Rock) and resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC). For all materials, specimens (sets of six) were matured at room temperature for time intervals of 10 minutes, 1 hour and 6 weeks, then exposed to either deionized water or sodium fluoride solution (1000 ppm in fluoride) for 24 hours. Following this, all specimens were placed in deionized water for additional 24 hours and fluoride release was measured.
resultsStorage in water led to increase in mass in all cases due to water uptake, with uptake varying with maturing time and material type. Storage in aqueous NaF led to variable results. Glass carbomer showed mass losses at all maturing times, whereas the conventional glass ionomer gained mass for some maturing times, and the resin-modified glass ionomer gained mass for all maturing times. All materials released fluoride into deionized water, with glass carbomer showing the highest release. For both types of glass ionomer, uptake of fluoride led to enhanced fluoride release into deionized water. In contrast, uptake by glass carbomer did not lead to increased fluoride release, although it was substantially higher than the uptake by both types of glass ionomer.
conclusionsGlass carbomer resembles glass ionomer cements in its fluoride uptake behavior but differs when considering that its fluoride uptake does not lead to increased fluoride release.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.