Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30810347›Full record

ArticleJournal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology2019

Pharmacokinetics of HLD200, a Delayed-Release and Extended-Release Methylphenidate: Evaluation of Dose Proportionality, Food Effect, Multiple-Dose Modeling, and Comparative Bioavailability with Immediate-Release Methylphenidate in Healthy Adults.

Tao Liu, Jogarao V S Gobburu, Michelle D Po, Angus McLean, Norberto J DeSousa, Floyd R Sallee, Bev Incledon

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tao Liu1 Center for Translational Medicine, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jogarao V S Gobburu1 Center for Translational Medicine, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michelle D Po2 Highland Therapeutics Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Angus McLean3 Ironshore Pharmaceuticals and Development, Inc., Camana Bay, Cayman Islands.
Norberto J DeSousa3 Ironshore Pharmaceuticals and Development, Inc., Camana Bay, Cayman Islands.
Floyd R Sallee3 Ironshore Pharmaceuticals and Development, Inc., Camana Bay, Cayman Islands.
Bev Incledon3 Ironshore Pharmaceuticals and Development, Inc., Camana Bay, Cayman Islands.
St. Matthew's University · KYUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHLD200, an oral, once-daily, evening-dosed, delayed-release, and extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH), was designed to provide efficacy from the early morning, throughout the day, and into the evening to individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The objectives were to evaluate DR/ER-MPH pharmacokinetic (PK) properties in healthy adults, including dose proportionality, food effect, the potential of accumulation using multiple-dose modeling, and bioavailability compared to an immediate-release MPH (IR MPH).

methodsThree open-label, single-dose, crossover studies were conducted, all with a 7-day washout between treatments. In Study I, 20 subjects received evening-dosed DR/ER-MPH (20 and 100 mg) followed by a medium-fat breakfast; 13 subjects received a subsequent 100-mg dose of DR/ER-MPH followed by a low-fat breakfast. In Study II, 18 subjects were evaluated after receiving evening-dosed DR/ER-MPH (100 mg) under 3 conditions: immediately after a high-fat meal, sprinkled on applesauce, and in a fasted state. In Study III, 11 and 12 subjects received evening-dosed DR/ER-MPH (100 mg) and morning-dosed IR MPH (20 mg), respectively.

resultsDR/ER-MPH demonstrated dose proportionality between 20- and 100-mg doses. DR/ER-MPH PK parameters were not significantly affected by breakfast content or by sprinkling capsule contents. A high-fat meal immediately preceding evening dosing did not affect total MPH exposure but lowered peak MPH exposure by 14% and 11% versus fasted and sprinkled states, and time to peak exposure was delayed by ∼2.5 hours; these PK differences are unlikely to be clinically significant. Based on multiple-dose simulations using data from Study I, negligible accumulation of DR/ER-MPH was predicted. The relative bioavailability for DR/ER-MPH compared to IR MPH was 73.9%. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported, and the observed AEs were consistent with MPH. There were no discontinuations in Studies I and III, but three participants withdrew in Study II due to AEs.

conclusionsEvening-dosed DR/ER-MPH demonstrated dose proportionality and can be administered with or without food. Significant accumulation is unlikely with multiple dosing.

Indexed as

MethylphenidateAdultAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBiological AvailabilityCentral Nervous System StimulantsCross-Over StudiesDelayed-Action PreparationsDietFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsDelayed-Action PreparationsMethylphenidateattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderdose proportionalityfood effectmethylphenidatepharmacokineticsrelative bioavailability

Identifiers

PMID30810347
PMCPMC6479242
OpenAlexW2916514182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.