Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30810273›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2019

Exploring infant signing to enhance responsive parenting: Findings from the INSIGHT study.

Ian M Paul, Emily E Hohman, Leann L Birch, Amy Shelly, Claire D Vallotton, Jennifer S Savage

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01167270 (The Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01167270 nacompletednot on this map

The Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIan M. Paul, MDRan2012 to 2023Enrolled316ConditionsInfant, ObesityArmsChild Safety Insights, Parenting Insights
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ian M PaulPediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-6344-8609
Emily E HohmanCenter for Childhood Obesity Research, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Leann L BirchFoods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Amy ShellyPediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Claire D VallottonHuman Development and Family Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Jennifer S SavageCenter for Childhood Obesity Research, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Preventing Obesity through Intervention during InfancyR01DK088244 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI PAUL, IAN M, WILLIAMS, JENNIFER SAVAGE · 2011 to 2022
$7.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responsive parenting is a promising framework for obesity prevention, yet attempts to date have largely relied on parents accurately interpreting their child's cues. Infant signing or "baby sign language" could enhance these interventions by improving bidirectional parent-child communication during the preverbal and emerging language years. In a clinical trial testing, a responsive parenting intervention designed for obesity prevention, we pilot tested a brief intervention at age 40 weeks with a subset of participating dyads that taught the signing gesture of "all done" to improve parental recognition of satiety. In addition, we surveyed all participating mothers at child age 18 months on the use of infant signing gestures in the prior year. Two hundred twenty-eight mothers completed the survey including 72 responsive parenting group mothers that received the signing instructions. A majority of mothers, 63.6%, reported teaching their infant signs in the prior year, and 61.4% of infants were using signs to communicate at 18 months (median signs = 2). The signs for "more" and "all done" were used by over half of study participants and were the most common signs used. Other signs related to eating or drinking were commonly used. Signing intervention group infants were more likely to use the sign for "all done" than controls (63.9% vs. 45.5%; P = 0.01), but there was no difference between groups with regard to the use of the sign for "more" (56.9% vs. 51.3%; P = 0.43). Signing is commonly used by parents of young children and holds potential to improve parental responsiveness and obesity prevention efforts.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorInfant BehaviorManual CommunicationMother-Child RelationsParentingAdultFemaleHumansHungerInfantMaleMealsPediatric ObesityPilot ProjectsSatiety ResponseSurveys and Questionnairesinfant signingobesity preventionresponsive parenting

Identifiers

PMID30810273
PMCPMC6594880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.