Trial reportPharmacoEconomics2019
Estimation of Cost for Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in a High-Risk Population in Rural China: Results from a Population-Level Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in PharmacoEconomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01688908 (Effcacy of Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in China), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effcacy of Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in China (ESECC): a Population-based Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of endoscopic screening for non-cardia gastric cancer: a 12-year report of a population-based randomized trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of Risk-based Sequential Screening for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer (ERSS-EGC): A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Estimated five-year survival and direct healthcare costs of adult patients with gastric cancer: real-world evidence from a tertiary hospital in Colombia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Advances of aptamers in esophageal cancer diagnosis, treatment and drug delivery.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Challenge and future of cancer screening in China: Insights from esophageal cancer screening practice.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- Stage-Specific Survival From Esophageal Cancer in China and Implications for Control Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Gastro hep advances · 2023Review
- Economic Burden Conferred by Population-Level Cancer Screening on Resource-Limited Communities: Lessons From the ESECC Trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Cost-effectiveness of precision screening for esophageal cancer based on individualized risk stratification in China: Real-world evidence from the ESECC trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Improved esophageal squamous cell carcinoma screening effectiveness by risk-stratified endoscopic screening: evidence from high-risk areas in China.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2021Article
- Health-seeking behavior and barriers to treatment of patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer detected by screening in rural China: real-world evidence from the ESECC trial.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2021Article
- Development and Validation of an Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Risk Prediction Model for Rural Chinese: Multicenter Cohort Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Serum metabolomics analysis for the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
- Precision screening for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020Article
- Identification of cancer patients using claims data from health insurance systems: A real-world comparative study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePopulation-level endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer has been conducted in China for years. In this study, we aim to provide an updated and precise cost estimation for esophageal cancer screening based on a randomized controlled trial in a high-risk area in China.
methodsWe estimated the cost of esophageal cancer screening with chromoendoscopy using a micro-costing approach based on primary data of the ESECC (Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in China) randomized controlled trial (NCT01688908) from a health sector perspective. Unit costs and quantities of resources were collected to obtain annual screening costs. The screening project was then theoretically expanded to a 10-year period to explore long-term trends of costs. Costs were adjusted to US dollars for the year 2018.
resultsIn the ESECC trial, screening cost per endoscopy with a valid pathologic diagnosis was $196, accounting for 3.82% of the gross domestic product per capita in Hua County, and the costs for detecting one esophageal cancer and one early-stage esophageal cancer were $26,347 and $37,687, respectively. In conventional screening in which protocol-driven costs were excluded, costs as above were $134, $18,074, and $25,853. The cost for detecting one gastric cardia cancer or stomach cancer was nine times higher than detecting one esophageal cancer owing to low prevalences of the two cancers. In a simulated 10-year screening project, annual cost decreased notably over time.
conclusionsDespite the relatively low absolute cost, population-level endoscopic screening will still be a heavy burden on local government considering the socioeconomic conditions. Long-lasting programs would be less costly and population-level screening would make little sense in non-high-risk regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.