ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2019
The utility of
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- New horizons in nuclear cardiology: Imaging of peripheral arterial disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025Review
- The Potential Role of PET in the Management of Peripheral Artery Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Incremental value of myocardial wall motion and thickening to perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for viability assessment in patients with ischemic heart failure.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Multiparametric Evaluation of Post-MI Small Animal Models Using Metabolic ([International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The complexity of using resting myocardial perfusion to assess myocardial viability and predict functional recovery.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Role of quantitative myocardial blood flow andJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Quantitative clinical nuclear cardiology, part 2: Evolving/emerging applications.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Review
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Review
- Simplified quantification of PET myocardial blood flow: The need for technical standardization.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- QuantitativeJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byQuantitative2019
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsConsecutive patients (N = 120) referred for evaluation of myocardial viability prior to revascularization and normal volunteers (N = 37) were reviewed. Dynamic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.