ArticleGeroScience2020
What is the rate-limiting step towards aging? Chemical reaction kinetics might reconcile contradictory observations in experimental aging research.
Article in GeroScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Chemical Reactivity of Membrane Lipids.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Cysteine Is the Only Universally Affected and Disfavored Proteomic Amino Acid under Oxidative Conditions in Animals.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The bridge between cell survival and cell death: reactive oxygen species-mediated cellular stress.EXCLI journal · 2023Review
- Probing the Role of Cysteine Thiyl Radicals in Biology: Eminently Dangerous, Difficult to Scavenge.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cell Culture Characterization of Prooxidative Chain-Transfer Agents as Novel Cytostatic Drugs.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Sensory and memory processing in old female and male Wistar rat brain, and its relationship with the cortical and hippocampal redox state.GeroScience · 2021Article
- Flux control in the aging cascade.Aging · 2021Article
- The Lipidome Fingerprint of Longevity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern geroscience is divided as regards the validity of the free radical theory of aging. Thermodynamic arguments and observations from comparative zoology support it, whereas results from experimental manipulations in representative animal species sometimes strongly contradict it. From a comparison of the multi-step aging process with a linear metabolic pathway (glycolysis), we here argue that the identification of the rate-limiting kinetic steps of the aging cascade is essential to understand the overall flux through the cascade, i.e., the rate of aging. Examining free radical reactions as a case in point, these reactions usually occur as chain reactions with three kinetically independent steps: initiation, propagation, and termination, each of which can be rate-limiting. Revisiting the major arguments in favor and against a role of free radicals in aging, we find that the majority of arguments in favor point to radical propagation as relevant and rate-limiting, whereas almost all arguments in disfavor are based on experimental manipulations of radical initiation or radical termination which turned out to be ineffective. We conclude that the overall lack of efficacy of antioxidant supplementation (which fosters termination) and antioxidant enzyme overexpression (which inhibits initiation) in longevity studies is attributable to the fact that initiation and termination are not the rate-limiting steps of the aging cascade. The biological and evolutionary plausibility of this interpretation is discussed. In summary, radical propagation is predicted to be rate-limiting for aging and should be explored in more detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.