Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809700›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2019

Remotely programmed sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of patients with refractory overactive bladder: a prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel sacral neuromodulation device.

Yaoguang Zhang, Peng Zhang, Xiaojun Tian, Guoqing Chen, Yan Li, Yong Zhang, Zhihui Xu, Zhongqing Wei, Wei Zhang, Lulin Ma and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Application and progress of neuromodulation in lower urinary tract dysfunction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Yaoguang ZhangUrology Department, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Peng ZhangUrology Department, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojun TianUrology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Guoqing ChenUrology Department, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Capital Medical University, No. 10 North Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100068, People's Republic of China.
Yan LiUrology Department, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Yong ZhangUrology Department, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Zhihui XuUrology Department, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, People's Republic of China.
Zhongqing WeiUrology Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, People's Republic of China.
Wei ZhangUrology Department, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Lulin MaUrology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Benkang ShiUrology Department, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Limin LiaoUrology Department, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Capital Medical University, No. 10 North Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100068, People's Republic of China. lmliao@263.net.
Jianye WangUrology Department, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China. jianye_wangbhp@126.com.
Peking University · CNChina Rehabilitation Research Center · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNBeijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFC0105500the National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC2002200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe efficacy and safety of a novel remotely programmed BetterStim sacral neuromodulation (SNM) system was evaluated in patients with refractory overactive bladder (OAB) in a prospective, controlled, multicenter trial.

methodsA total of 84 patients referred for SNM therapy from October 2015 to January 2018 were studied. Of the patients who qualified for implantation, 37 and 33 were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups, respectively. Patients in the treatment group underwent stimulation upon implantation, while stimulation was delayed in the control group for 3 months. Follow-up visits, consisting of voiding diary outcome, questionnaires regarding overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and quality of life were conducted at 1, 3, and 6-month post-implantation.

resultsCompared with the control group, subjects in the treatment group exhibited statistically significant improvement in OAB symptoms at 3 months. The overall success rate was achieved in 72% of the treatment group, compared with 12% of the control group at 3 months. At 6 months, there were no significant differences in key voiding diary variables between the two groups. Further, this study demonstrated sustained improvement in urinary symptom interference in OAB patients. In addition, nearly all patients expressed great satisfaction with the remote-programming methods. No serious adverse events occurred, and device-related adverse events rate was 12.86%.

conclusionThis clinical study demonstrates subjective and objective success of the BetterStim SNM system. Importantly, our data suggest that remote programming can be safely used as a viable option for the conventional programming with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

TelemedicineAdultAgedElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansImplantable NeurostimulatorsLumbosacral PlexusMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder, OveractiveElectric stimulationOveractive bladderProgrammingRandomized controlled trialUrinary bladder

Identifiers

PMID30809700
OpenAlexW2917774245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.