Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809664›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2019

Immunogenicity of biologic agents in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Martijn J H Doeleman, Erik M van Maarseveen, Joost F Swart

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pediatric uveitis: Role of the pediatrician.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martijn J H DoelemanDepartment of Paediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht.
Erik M van MaarseveenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Division of Laboratory Medicine and Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joost F SwartDepartment of Paediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht.
Wilhelmina Children's Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe clinical impact of anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs) in paediatric patients with JIA remains unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the prevalence of ADAbs in JIA studies; investigate the effect of ADAbs on treatment efficacy and adverse events; and explore the effect of immunosuppressive therapy on antibody formation.

methodsPubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify relevant clinical trials and observational studies that reported prevalence of ADAbs. Studies were systematically reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses and appropriate proportional and pairwise meta-analyses were performed.

resultsA total of 5183 references were screened; 28 articles, involving 26 studies and 2354 JIA patients, met eligibility criteria. Prevalence of ADAbs ranged from 0% to 82% across nine biologic agents. Overall pooled prevalence of ADAbs was 16.9% (95% CI, 9.5, 25.9). Qualitative analysis of included studies indicated that antibodies to infliximab, adalimumab, anakinra and tocilizumab were associated with treatment failure and/or hypersensitivity reactions. Concomitant MTX uniformly reduced the risk of antibody formation during adalimumab treatment (risk ratio 0.33; 95% CI 0.21, 0.52).

conclusionThe association of ADAbs with treatment failure and hypersensitivity reactions indicates their clinical relevance in paediatric patients with JIA. Based on our findings, we recommend a preliminary course of action regarding immunogenicity of biologic agents in patients with JIA. Further strategies to predict, prevent, detect and manage immunogenicity could optimize treatment outcomes and personalize treatment with biologic therapies.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAdalimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, JuvenileBiological FactorsChildClinical Trials as TopicHumansInfliximabInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinMethotrexateObservational Studies as TopicAdalimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsBiological FactorsInfliximabInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinMethotrexatetocilizumabanti-drug antibodiesbiologic agentsbiologic therapiesimmunogenicityjuvenile idiopathic arthritismethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID30809664
PMCPMC6758589
OpenAlexW2917936278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.