Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809592›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2018

The development and evaluation of an online application to assist in the extraction of data from graphs for use in systematic reviews.

Fala Cramond, Alison O'Mara-Eves, Lee Doran-Constant, Andrew Sc Rice, Malcolm Macleod, James Thomas

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 24 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 24 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 24 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. The effect of hyperoxia on muscle sympathetic nerve activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Physical activity and pain in people with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Cytogenetic Effects in Children Exposed to Air Pollutants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fala CramondPain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alison O'Mara-EvesEPPI-Centre, Department of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0359-6423
Lee Doran-ConstantIndependent Researcher, Manchester, UK.
Andrew Sc RicePain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9533-5636
Malcolm MacleodCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-9839
James ThomasEPPI-Centre, Department of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-4190

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N015665/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

automationdata extractiongraphsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30809592
PMCPMC6372928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.