ReviewInternational journal of women's dermatology2019
Beyond the physician's perspective: A review of patient-reported outcomes in dermatologic surgery and cosmetic dermatology.
Review in International journal of women's dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- An organizational framework for patient-reported outcome instruments in dermatologic surgery: a systematic review and qualitative analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Liquid AbobotulinumtoxinA Formulation for Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled and Open-Label Study.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2022Trial
- Mapping the Global Research Landscape: A Bibliometric Analysis of Clinical Trials on Skin Aging-Trends, Innovations, and Research Gaps.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Radiofrequency for Facial & Neck Rejuvenation: A Bibliometric Analysis.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Review
- Reduction of surgical-site infections and improvement of scar parameters with a uniform fractional ultra-pulse CO₂ laser protocol in cosmetic surgery: a five-center retrospective cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Overdiagnosis of Melanoma: Is It a Real Problem?Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Article
- Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023Article
- Item-specific patterns of the Skindex-17 in individuals with different levels of Hidradenitis Suppurativa severity: a network analysis study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Look Better, Feel Better, Live Better? The Impact of Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Procedures on Satisfaction with Appearance and Psychosocial Wellbeing.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2022Review
- Article
- Psychosocial distress in patients with cutaneous melanoma: validation of the Skin Cancer Index (SCI).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Patient Satisfaction with AbobotulinumtoxinA for Aesthetic Use in the Upper Face: A Systematic Literature Review andThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2021Review
- Patient reported cosmetic outcome after vacuum assisted excision of benign breast lesions: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Patient-reported Aesthetic Satisfaction following Facial Skin Cancer Surgery Using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are utilized in health care to quantify the patient's perspective of a health condition or treatment on outcomes, such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient satisfaction. In dermatology, this is particularly relevant because the patient's perspective is critical in evaluating the outcome of cosmetic procedures as well as skin cancer treatment. We review seven validated PROMs that have been reported in the dermatologic surgery and cosmetic dermatology literature. For patients undergoing cosmetic procedures, the use of PROMs provides additional valuable outcome data beyond physician assessment. For patients with skin cancer, women experience a unique and often greater impact on HRQoL during treatment, which has been captured through PROMs. The recent development of multi-module instruments, such as the FACE-Q and FACE-Q Skin Cancer, have facilitated comprehensive assessments of treatment that impact multiple domains of HRQoL. The use of PROMs allows for dermatologists to reliably capture important disease- and treatment-related concerns, thus improving the patient experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.