Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809448›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Breastfeeding in the time of Zika: a systematic literature review.

Clara Luz Sampieri, Hilda Montero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Breastfeeding and the Risk of Infant Illness in Asia: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Viruses and Human Milk: Transmission or Protection?Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Impact of maternal nutrition in viral infections during pregnancy.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2021
    Review
  13. Breast Milk: A Meal Worth Having.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The Microbiota of the Human Mammary Ecosystem.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clara Luz SampieriInstituto de Salud Pública, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
Hilda MonteroInstituto de Salud Pública, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe disease Zika is considered as emergent. The infection can be acquired through different routes: a bite from the

objectivesTo review published evidence of the probable transmission of Zika through human lactation. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EBSCO, Gale, Science Direct, Scopus, US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and Web of Science. World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention web pages. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: To be eligible, studies of any design had to provide primary data of human breast milk as a potential fluid for the transmission of Zika, or primary or secondary follow-up data of infants with at least one previous published study that complied with the first criterion of eligibility.

participantsStudies about women with suspected, probable or confirmed Zika during pregnancy, or the postnatal period and beyond. Studies about infants who breastfeed directly from the breast or where fed with the expressed breast milk of the suspected, probable or confirmed women with Zika.

resultsThis study only chose data from research papers; no patients were taken directly by the authors. A total of 1,146 were screened and nine studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, from which a total of 10 cases were identified, with documented follow-up in three of these cases. Through the timing of maternal Zika infection, five cases were classified as prenatal (time before delivery), one as immediate postnatal (period from 0 to 4 days after birth); no cases were classified as medium postnatal (period from 5 days to 8 weeks after birth); two were classified as long postnatal (period from 8 weeks to 6 months after birth) and two as beyond six months after birth.

conclusionHuman milk may be considered as a potentially infectious fluid, but we found no currently documented studies of the long-term complications in infants up to 32 months of age, with suspected, probable or confirmed Zika through human lactation, or evidence with respect to the human pathophysiology of the infection acquired through human lactation. In the light of the studies reviewed here, the World Health Organization recommendation of June 29th 2016, remains valid: "the benefits of breastfeeding for the infant and mother outweigh any potential risk of Zika virus transmission through breast milk."

Indexed as

Human lactationHuman-milkNursing motherTransmissionZika

Identifiers

PMID30809448
PMCPMC6385688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.