Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809442›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Variation in pelvic shape and size in Eastern European males: a computed tomography comparative study.

Bartosz Musielak, Anna Maria Kubicka, Michał Rychlik, Jarosław Czubak, Adam Czwojdziński, Andrzej Grzegorzewski, Marek Jóźwiak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The accuracy and precision of acetabular implant measurements from CT imaging.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bartosz Musielak *Department of Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Anna Maria Kubicka *Department of Zoology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Michał RychlikDivision of Virtual Engineering, Poznań University of Technology, Poznań, Poland.
Jarosław CzubakDepartment of Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Otwock, Poland.
Adam CzwojdzińskiDepartment of Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Otwock, Poland.
Andrzej GrzegorzewskiDepartment of Orthopedics and Pediatric Orthopedics, Medical University of Lódź, Łódź, Poland.
Marek JóźwiakDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLMedical University of Lodz · PLPoznań University of Technology · PLUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe significantly accelerated development of human society in the last millennium has brought about changes in human behavior and body mass that may have influenced human bone morphology. Our objective was to analyze the variation in pelvic shape and size in males from modern and medieval populations.

methodsWe obtained 22 pelvic girdles of adult males from a medieval cemetery located in Cedynia, Poland. The control group comprised 31 contemporary male pelves from individuals inhabiting the same region. The analyzed parameters were: interspinous distance (ISD), intercristal distance (ICD), intertuberous distance (ITD), anatomic conjugate of the pelvis, height of the pelvis (HP), iliac opening angle (IOA), iliac tilt angle (ITA), and ISD/ITD/HP ratio. Geometric morphometrics was used to analyze differences in shape in the pelves. All analyses were carried out on three-dimensional CT reconstructions of pelves.

resultsISD, ICD, and IOA were significantly greater in modern pelves than in those from Cedynia, but no significant differences were seen between the two groups in ITD, anatomical conjugate, HP, or ITA. ISD/ITD/HP ratios were significantly lower in the Cedynia group. Geometric morphometrics revealed significant differences in pelvic shape between the analyzed groups. DISCUSSION: The pelves of modern males are larger, wider, and flatter than those of medieval males. Changes in the set of daily activities that produce mechanical loading and estimated body mass may constitute the main factors explaining pelvic variability. However, differences in ontogenesis should also be taken into consideration, especially since growth in past populations is often found to be reduced relative to modern populations.

Indexed as

Geometric morphometricsMedieval populationThree-dimensional reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID30809442
PMCPMC6387581
OpenAlexW2915491968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.