ArticlePeerJ2019
Fecal microbiota transplantation research output from 2004 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research landscape and advancements on the links between the gut microbiome and insulin resistance: hot issues, trends, future directions, and bibliometric analysis.Gut pathogens · 2025Article
- Article
- Gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders: where do we stand?Gut pathogens · 2023Article
- Unveiling the hidden world of gut health: Exploring cutting-edge research through visualizing randomized controlled trials on the gut microbiota.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Global research trends on the links between the gut microbiome and cancer: a visualization analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Nonpharmacological Treatment Strategies for the Management of Canine Chronic Inflammatory Enteropathy-A Narrative Review.Veterinary sciences · 2022Review
- Research trends on clinical fecal microbiota transplantation: A biliometric analysis from 2001 to 2021.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Global research trends in the microbiome related to irritable bowel syndrome: A bibliometric and visualized study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Health economic evaluations comparing faecal microbiota transplantation with antibiotics for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review.Health economics review · 2021Review
- The landscape of microbiota research in Iran; a bibliometric and network analysis.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2020Article
- Global research trends in microbiome-gut-brain axis during 2009-2018: a bibliometric and visualized study.BMC gastroenterology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging therapy against
methodsStudies published from 2004 to 2017 were extracted from the Science Citation Index Expanded. Bibliometric analysis was used to evaluate the number or cooperation network of publications, countries, citations, references, journals, authors, institutions and keywords.
resultsA total of 796 items were included, showing an increasing trend annually. Publications mainly came from 10 countries, led by the US (
conclusionsThis study shows the research performance of FMT from 2004 to 2017 and helps investigators master the trend of FMT, which is also an ongoing hotspot of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.