Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809429›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Diversity, spatial distribution and activity of fungi in freshwater ecosystems.

Cécile Lepère, Isabelle Domaizon, Jean-Francois Humbert, Ludwig Jardillier, Mylène Hugoni, Didier Debroas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Two Novel Genera,Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Patterns of fungal community assembly across twoFrontiers in ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile LepèreLaboratoire: Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Isabelle DomaizonCARRTEL, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRA, Thonon Les Bains, France.
Jean-Francois HumbertiEES Paris, Sorbonne Université, INRA, Paris, France.
Ludwig JardillierUnité d'Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Mylène HugoniCNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, INRA, UMR1418, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne Cedex, France.
Didier DebroasLaboratoire: Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
AgroParisTech · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLaboratoire Microorganismes Génome et Environnement · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRUniversité Savoie Mont Blanc · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing has given new insights into aquatic fungal community ecology over the last 10 years. Based on 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences publicly available, we investigated fungal richness and taxonomic composition among 25 lakes and four rivers. We used a single pipeline to process the reads from raw data to the taxonomic affiliation. In addition, we studied, for a subset of lakes, the active fraction of fungi through the 18S rRNA transcripts level. These results revealed a high diversity of fungi that can be captured by 18S rRNA primers. The most OTU-rich groups were Dikarya (47%), represented by putative filamentous fungi more diverse and abundant in freshwater habitats than previous studies have suggested, followed by Cryptomycota (17.6%) and Chytridiomycota (15.4%). The active fraction of the community showed the same dominant groups as those observed at the 18S rRNA genes level. On average 13.25% of the fungal OTUs were active. The small number of OTUs shared among aquatic ecosystems may result from the low abundances of those microorganisms and/or they constitute allochthonous fungi coming from other habitats (e.g., sediment or catchment areas). The richness estimates suggest that fungi have been overlooked and undersampled in freshwater ecosystems, especially rivers, though they play key roles in ecosystem functioning as saprophytes and parasites.

Indexed as

DiversityFreshwatersFungiMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID30809429
PMCPMC6387782
OpenAlexW2917487276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.