Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809241›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019

Soil and Crop Management Practices to Minimize the Impact of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity.

S M Nuruzzaman Manik, Georgina Pengilley, Geoffrey Dean, Brian Field, Sergey Shabala, Meixue Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Waterlogging and hypoxia in plant abiotic stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S M Nuruzzaman ManikTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.
Georgina PengilleyTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.
Geoffrey DeanTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.
Brian FieldTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.
Sergey ShabalaTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.
Meixue ZhouTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, TAS, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waterlogging remains a significant constraint to cereal production across the globe in areas with high rainfall and/or poor drainage. Improving tolerance of plants to waterlogging is the most economical way of tackling the problem. However, under severe waterlogging combined agronomic, engineering and genetic solutions will be more effective. A wide range of agronomic and engineering solutions are currently being used by grain growers to reduce losses from waterlogging. In this scoping study, we reviewed the effects of waterlogging on plant growth, and advantages and disadvantages of various agronomic and engineering solutions which are used to mitigate waterlogging damage. Further research should be focused on: cost/benefit analyses of different drainage strategies; understanding the mechanisms of nutrient loss during waterlogging and quantifying the benefits of nutrient application; increasing soil profile de-watering through soil improvement and agronomic strategies; revealing specificity of the interaction between different management practices and environment as well as among management practices; and more importantly, combined genetic, agronomic and engineering strategies for varying environments.

Indexed as

agronomic practicesdrainagegenetic solutionssoil engineeringwaterlogging tolerance

Identifiers

PMID30809241
PMCPMC6379354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.