Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809142›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2019

Automated Detection of High-Frequency Oscillations in Epilepsy Based on a Convolutional Neural Network.

Rui Zuo, Jing Wei, Xiaonan Li, Chunlin Li, Cui Zhao, Zhaohui Ren, Ying Liang, Xinling Geng, Chenxi Jiang, Xiaofeng Yang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Networks through the lens of high-frequency oscillations.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Epileptic Seizures Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rui ZuoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing WeiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaonan LiNeuroelectrophysiological Laboratory, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chunlin LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Cui ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhaohui RenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ying LiangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xinling GengSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chenxi JiangNeuroelectrophysiological Laboratory, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng YangNeuroelectrophysiological Laboratory, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xu ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNChinese Institute for Brain Research · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) have emerged as promising biomarkers for the epileptogenic zone. However, visual marking of HFOs is a time-consuming and laborious process. Several automated techniques have been proposed to detect HFOs, yet these are still far from being suitable for application in a clinical setting. Here, ripples and fast ripples from intracranial electroencephalograms were detected in six patients with intractable epilepsy using a convolutional neural network (CNN) method. This approach proved more accurate than using four other HFO detectors integrated in RIPPLELAB, providing a higher sensitivity (77.04% for ripples and 83.23% for fast ripples) and specificity (72.27% for ripples and 79.36% for fast ripples) for HFO detection. Furthermore, for one patient, the Cohen's kappa coefficients comparing automated detection and visual analysis results were 0.541 for ripples and 0.777 for fast ripples. Hence, our automated detector was capable of reliable estimates of ripples and fast ripples with higher sensitivity and specificity than four other HFO detectors. Our detector may be used to assist clinicians in locating epileptogenic zone in the future.

Indexed as

automated detectionconvolutional neural networkepilepsyfast rippleshigh-frequency oscillationsripples

Identifiers

PMID30809142
PMCPMC6379273
OpenAlexW2914170396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.