Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809125›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2019

GATA3 Promotes the Neural Progenitor State but Not Neurogenesis in 3D Traumatic Injury Model of Primary Human Cortical Astrocytes.

Hilal Celikkaya, Mehmet Ilyas Cosacak, Christos Papadimitriou, Stanislava Popova, Prabesh Bhattarai, Srijeeta Nag Biswas, Tohid Siddiqui, Sabrina Wistorf, Isabel Nevado-Alcalde, Lisa Naumann and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Type 1 Interleukin-4 Signaling Obliterates Mouse AstrogliaFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hilal CelikkayaGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Mehmet Ilyas CosacakGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Christos PapadimitriouGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Stanislava PopovaGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Prabesh BhattaraiGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Srijeeta Nag BiswasGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Tohid SiddiquiGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Sabrina WistorfGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Isabel Nevado-AlcaldeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Lisa NaumannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Violeta MashkaryanGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Kerstin BrandtGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
Uwe FreudenbergCenter for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Carsten WernerCenter for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Caghan KizilGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, Dresden, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DETU Dresden · DELeibniz Institute of Polymer Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes are abundant cell types in the vertebrate central nervous system and can act as neural stem cells in specialized niches where they constitutively generate new neurons. Outside the stem cell niches, however, these glial cells are not neurogenic. Although injuries in the mammalian central nervous system lead to profound proliferation of astrocytes, which cluster at the lesion site to form a gliotic scar, neurogenesis does not take place. Therefore, a plausible regenerative therapeutic option is to coax the endogenous reactive astrocytes to a pre-neurogenic progenitor state and use them as an endogenous reservoir for repair. However, little is known on the mechanisms that promote the neural progenitor state after injuries in humans. Gata3 was previously found to be a mechanism that zebrafish brain uses to injury-dependent induction of neural progenitors. However, the effects of GATA3 in human astrocytes after injury are not known. Therefore, in this report, we investigated how overexpression of GATA3 in primary human astrocytes would affect the neurogenic potential before and after injury in 2D and 3D cultures. We found that primary human astrocytes are unable to induce GATA3 after injury. Lentivirus-mediated overexpression of GATA3 significantly increased the number of GFAP/SOX2 double positive astrocytes and expression of pro-neural factor ASCL1, but failed to induce neurogenesis, suggesting that GATA3 is required for enhancing the neurogenic potential of primary human astrocytes and is not sufficient to induce neurogenesis alone.

Indexed as

GATA3neural progenitorsneurogenic potentialprimary human astrocytesscratch injurySOX2

Identifiers

PMID30809125
PMCPMC6380212
OpenAlexW2914071768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.