Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809089›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Recurrent corneal erosion: a comprehensive review.

Darby D Miller, Syed A Hasan, Nathaniel L Simmons, Michael W Stewart

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Long-Term Tolerability and Safety of AAV5-Id3 Gene Therapy to Eyes.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Repair of Corneal Epithelial Defects.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Trigger Factors in Recurrent Corneal Erosion Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Scleral lenses and PROSE: indications, complications, and future challenges.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy for treatment-resistant recurrent corneal erosion syndrome.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  17. Classic lattice corneal dystrophy: a brief review and summary of treatment modalities.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Squishy matters - Corneal mechanobiology in health and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darby D MillerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA, miller.darby@mayo.edu.
Syed A HasanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA, miller.darby@mayo.edu.
Nathaniel L SimmonsDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Michael W StewartDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA, miller.darby@mayo.edu.
Jacksonville College · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo comprehensively review the literature regarding recurrent corneal erosion (RCE) and to present treatment options and recommendations for management. OVERVIEW: RCE usually presents with sharp, unilateral pain upon awakening, in an eye with an underlying basement membrane dystrophy, prior ocular trauma, stromal dystrophy or degeneration, or prior surgery for refractive errors, cataracts, or corneal transplantation. Making the correct diagnosis requires a careful slit-lamp examination of both eyes coupled with a high degree of suspicion. Several treatments are commonly used for RCE but new therapies have been introduced recently. Conservative treatment consists of antibiotic and preservative-free lubricating drops, with topical cycloplegics and oral analgesics to control pain. Patients who are unresponsive to these therapies may benefit from therapeutic bandage contact lenses (BCL). Newer therapies include oral matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors, blood-derived eye drops, amniotic membrane graft application, and judicious application of topical corticosteroids. Once the epithelium is healed, a course of hypertonic saline solution and/or ointment can be used. Surgical procedures may be performed in patients who fail conservative therapy. Punctal occlusion with plugs increases the tear film volume. Epithelial debridement with diamond burr polishing (DBP), anterior stromal puncture (ASP), or alcohol delamination should be considered in selected patients. DBP can be used for patients with basement membrane dystrophies and is the preferred treatment overall due to a low recurrence rate. ASP can be used for erosions outside the central visual axis. Excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy is an attractive option in eyes with central RCE since it precisely removes tissue while preserving corneal transparency. In patients with RCE who are also candidates for refractive surgery, photorefractive keratectomy can be considered. SUMMARY: Newly introduced therapies for RCE enable therapy to be individualized and lower the recurrence rate.

Indexed as

anterior basement membrane dystrophycorneal abrasionepithelial basement membrane dystrophymap-dot-fingerprint dystrophyrecurrent corneal erosion

Identifiers

PMID30809089
PMCPMC6376883
OpenAlexW2912010972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.